A Critique of Neil Campbells Problem with Voluntary Euthanasia
A Critique of Neil Campbell's Problem with Voluntary Euthanasia Dr. Neil Campbell, author of "A Problem for the Idea of Voluntary Euthanasia," questions whether there can be a such thing as voluntary euthanasia. Euthanasia, or physician-assisted suicide, is the intentional termination of life by another at the explicit request of the person who dies. Dr. Campbell's main argument is that "if the pain and suffering are by definition unbearable, then it seems clear enough that the decision to die is not freely chosen but is compelled by the pain." Dr. Campbell, a Sessional Instructor in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Calgary, believes there is no clear cut way to differentiate between "voluntary" and "involuntary" euthanasia under certain conditions. Many would agree with Dr. Campbell Campbell regarding this but we still must be sure we are exercising the true wishes of the patient. His insight on physician-assisted suicide does pose a problem (as stated in the title) but what is the solution? Further distinction between voluntary and involuntary euthanasia is not the solution. There are always exceptions to the rule. In his discussion Dr. Campbell is aware that everyone is more concerned with the de
Campbell wants the distinction to be taken seriously. The analogy between the terminally ill patient and the tortured prisoner does not benefit his argument; it is a false analogy. The terminally ill patient is not subject to pain on order for someone else to profit from it, as is the prisoner. Does he only agree with euthanasia if pain and suffering are not factors but other quality of life issues? Does he even agree with euthanasia voluntary or involuntary? Dr. No one is as concerned with this distinction because involuntary euthanasia is unacceptable despite any situation and that is why Dr. The patient then signs the form in the presence of a witness and sends copies to practitioners and the next of kin. As with the terminally ill patient they know that death is the only way out of their pain and by keeping their selves alive they may be subject to a painfully long death. Some chose to leave with dignity and chose euthanasia so families will not be burdened with what would happen eventually anyway. While trying to follow his logic and support for his contradiction, you find yourself lost in his reasoning. Although what he states regarding voluntary and involuntary euthanasia is a valid argument there is no proof for his statements. Campbell concludes that "under the conditions of unbearable pain and suffering, then, if the concern of the agent is to alleviate the pain it seems to be a mistake to speak of voluntary choices.
Common topics in this essay:
Dr Campbell,
Euthanasia Society,
Dr Campbell's,
Campbell Campbell,
Voluntary Euthanasia,
dr campbell,
involuntary euthanasia,
voluntary involuntary,
voluntary involuntary euthanasia,
University Calgary,
Voluntary Euthanasia',
Campbell Neil,
Medical Ethics,
living wills,
voluntary euthanasia,
pain suffering,
dr campbell's,
Antony Flew,
distinction voluntary involuntary,
distinction voluntary,
terminally ill,
wishes patient,
terminally ill patient,
unbearable pain suffering,
exceptions rule discussion,
|
Acceptance Essays
