bnbkbk
What is the best way to address the question of nuclear proliferation in the coming century? In this paper I will state my views on the inevitability of nuclear proliferation and the views of others, as well as addressing what will come of the vertical proliferation of nuclear technology and delivery systems. The potential use of nuclear weapons continues to pose one of the greatest immediate dangers to world security (Zachary.D,p106?) Everything depends on how proliferation is managed. Mismanaged proliferation could produce disaster and well managed proliferation could reduce the threat of a nuclear war and other threats. The dangers that could arise from mismanaged proliferation are profound and numerous. There is the danger that the proliferation process itself could give one of the existing nuclear powers a strong incentive to stop a non-nuclear neighbor from joining the nuclear club, like how Israel used force to stop Iraq from acquiring a nuclear capability. There is also the danger that an unstable nuclear competition could emerge among the new nuclear states like India and Pakistan. They might lack the resources to make their nuclear forces invulnerable, which could create first-strike incentives. Also, there i
States could hide their weapons or remove themselves from this voluntary treaty, for example North Korea signed the NPT in 1985 and did not allow inspections until 1992 and they are widely suspected to own nuclear weapons. If nuclear proliferation were stopped dead in its tracks the states left out of the nuclear club would revert to using biological and chemical weapons that are uncontrollable, and pose a threat not only to the attacked country but the whole world. The first nuclear powers can agree to arms control like strategic arms reduction treaty between the US and the former U. So the knowledge of how to make a nuke is not as dangerous as the delivery system. Terrorists using nuclear weapons does not seem like a huge threat in the US but it may be in other states even so with a nuke vs. To stop preventive attacks, they can extend security guarantees. Also they can help to teach nuclear states to understand the power of the forces they are acquiring. D,p128?) I think that nuclear proliferation is inevitable and that the nuclear deterrence power of the US will be greater than other states because of the accuracy and power of our nukes and delivery systems. The power of the bombs dropped on Japan were about 16 megatons of TNT and now there are bombs that are over 300 megatons, this poses a threat for many countries because of the massive fallout that would follow a nuclear blast. Some states that are making nukes are as much as 20 years behind the US. The nuclear taboo and consequences of breaking the nuclear taboo will keep the rational leader away from firing a nuclear missile, that leaves irrational leaders who are willing to take the consequences and terrorists. The Nuclear Proliferation Treaty has attempted to contain the proliferation but with limited success because, it is very difficult to enforce. How can nations be persuaded that nuclear weapons do not increase their security?” “What are the alternatives?” (Zachary.
Common topics in this essay:
Atoms Peace,
India Pakistan,
,
North Korea,
Proliferation Treaty,
nuclear proliferation,
nuclear weapons,
nuclear powers,
delivery systems,
nuclear proliferation stopped,
proliferation nuclear,
vertical proliferation,
nuclear taboo,
biological weapon,
danger proliferation,
delivery system,
|
Acceptance Essays
