A struggle of survival of the inocent or a survival of the wanted? Caught between the two, the book Of Mice and Men takes a look at problem that may not only have happened, but still happens this day. In the story, George and Lennie face problems of survival, but each with problems of their own that lead to an ending of sadness. Lennie, a man that faces the struggle of living with mental defisciency, has a larger problem with security and searches for anything to be his "security blanket" that most people give up at a young age. George faces the problem of not so much needing comany wherever he goes, but rather needing someone who needs him. Little did George know that Lennie would be not only be to large of a needing person, but also the person that's life would proove humans to be inately wrong with will inately good as George is.
             First, a look at what Lennie did is needed. Lennie appears to be a very insecure person. His habbit of petting animals is obviously not just a habbit, but rather a cry for comfort. Unfortunately, for the animals sake, they did not live past maybe five simple strokes. Lennie did not in any way know that it was his fault that they died. To accuse him of killing them animals out of plain brutality would be insane. The mouse he found in the very begging of the book was too brital for his strength in his fingers. What could be so wrong about having stong figures from the sweat he gave just to please George? Lennie simply followed what George asked him to which was work very hard on farms to earn a bit of a living. Lennie, of course, also collected quite a bit of muscles. This is what really did the wrong.
             comming back to what Lennie did that was so bad, can they be justified? For instance, the time when he grabbed the waitresses dress because of the softness. It can easily be said that the girl didn't know what Lennies problem was and so cried rape, but the same thing can be said about lennie. Lennie had...