CLONING1
To Clone or Not to Clone? In February 1997, when Dr. Ian Wilmut and his team of scientists in Scotland astonished theworld by announcing that they had successfully cloned a sheep, it sparked an internationaldebate. Since the invention of Dolly, scientists have been faced with the imminent technology toclone human beings. This has raised questions about what it means to be human and whatrestrictions should be placed on scientific research. Scientists should use methods of cloning of individual human cells because it providesbenefits of curing diseases and regrowth of damaged organs or tissues. However, scientistsshould not clone whole adult human beings because of the violation of moral, ethical, andreligious concerns. Hence, scientists must separate making spare body parts from making whole Compton's Interactive Encyclopedia defines cloning as: The production of duplicate copies of genetic material, cells, or entire multicellular living organisms. The copies are referred to as clones. Cloning occurs naturally and is also engineered by human beings. The possibility that people might be cloned from the
It is wrong to use cloning to experiment withthe creation of human life. It's much easier to clone sheep or goats than humans,and according to the facts, it took over two hundred tries to produce one cloned sheep; theunsuccessful attempts were simply discarded. This claim was drawn from the gathering of information that cloning requires only anycell and a woman to develop in. Even the scientist who created Dolly, Dr. Scientists are making great strides in understanding the underlying causes of diseases,developing potential cures, and pursuing other promising areas of research. Cloning could offer a means of curing diseases or offer a technique that could providehealthy organs and tissues for people who need them. It would allow scientists not onlyto duplicate humans, but to perfect them as well. Instead of exterminating people whodidn't fit the standards of perfection, entire populations could be made to fit the mold. It seems like scientists areplaying God, and cloning interferes with the natural process that God has mapped out for people. Despite the arguments from scientists who urged the commission not to rush judgement withbans that could prevent human cloning and research, the commission approved The HumanCloning Research Prohibition Act. Eugenics such as these wouldhave been even easier by cloning and genetic engineering.
Common topics in this essay:
Interactive Encyclopedia,
Nazi Germany,
E7 Religious,
Ian Wilmut,
Deborah Mathis,
A3 Cloning,
Roger Highfield,
Robert Marquands,
Madeleine Nash,
Armey Cloning,
human cloning,
cloning humans,
human life,
genetic engineering,
cloning research,
ban human cloning,
moral ethical,
nuclear transfer,
seed plans,
cloning genetic,
cloning offer,
cloning genetic engineering,
support permanent ban,
permanent ban human,
house commerce committee,
|
Acceptance Essays
