An essay on the effect of acqueducts in ancient Rome A basic fact of life: humans
need water to survive. Therefore, it is not surprising that water has played an
important role in history. All of the ancient civilizations, including Rome, had to deal
with the problem of a steady water supply. Rome's solutions had both positive and
negative results. At first glance, one would think that Roae would have no problem
supplying water to her people. After all, the city was built on a river. Why would
water have to be brought into the city? There were several reasons: first of all, river
water is not known for its cleanliness. It may do for irrigation, but not for drinking.
Drinking water would either have be drawn up from wells, or brought in to the cities
from pure sources in the mountains. However, digging wells enough for several ten
thousand people is not practical, as wells need to be spaced far apart. Thus, the need
for aqueducts. Bringing water in from the mountains was no simple matter. The
easiest method of transporting water was gravity feed via a sloped channel or pipe.
However, there were hills and valleys which must be crossed. The Roman engineers
used a variety of techniques to overcome these obstacles. First, the rate of descent for
the channel must be determined. Using geometry and trigonometry, this is a relatively
simple problem of triangulation. Vetruvius said that each channel "must be leveled
with a fall of not less than half a foot in 100 feet." These calculations indicate that the
Romans had sufficient mathematical knowledge to undertake the aqueduct programs,
as well as engineering expertise. Since the channel for the water must go in a straight
line, then the next problem was where to put the line. The placement would have to
take into account the changes in elevation along the course of the channel. The
Romans took a course of compromise in their constructio
...