12 angry men
Although the 1957 movie "Twelve Angry Men" was not written for this purpose, it serves as an excellent portrayal of small group development. The author, Reginald Rose, had written it after his own personal experience serving as a juror. In "Twelve Angry Men" a young man stands accused of stabbing his own father to death. The jurors must unanimously decide the defendant's guilt or innocence. If found guilty, the accused will be put to death in the electric chair. To eleven of the jurors this is an open and shut case, but one lone juror stands against them to prove there is reasonable doubt. As the movie unfolds, you begin to see several group roles emerge. Initially, the jury foreman is filling the role of leader. He has been chosen to tabulate votes, call for evidence, and fulfill other organizational duties during deliberations. Over time, his leadership over the group begins to erode. At the onset, he appears to be a little hesitant, as if not quite sure how to proceed. He makes suggestions and looks for approval from the others. He contributes little to the discussion. As
The most obvious example of this is the baseball fan. Even though the other jurors were probably satisfied with their participation and they all agreed to vote not guilty, some did this with questionable motives. For instance, the baseball fan can be easily identified as the clown. The angry man changes his vote in the last minutes of the film and leaves you wondering if he truly had a change of heart or if he was just giving in to the pressure of being the last holdout. After insisting throughout deliberations that the boy was guilty, he suddenly changes his mind and votes not guilty. As Bormann predicts, the quiet members are the first ones eliminated in "Twelve Angry Men". In the end, he convinces all of the jurors to join him in voting not guilty. Since they probably came from glasses, he was bringing attention to the fact that her eyesight was questionable. It would be almost impossible for them to be satisfied with their decision. Several other jurors filled similar task roles. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. With his lack of participation in the discussion, the jury foreman is among those ruled out for this reason. While all of these disruptive roles were being demonstrated, the men exhibiting task roles were fighting against them to reach a fair, unbiased decision. By building our communication skills and avoiding faulty inferences, we can become very effective in the groups we work with every day.
Common topics in this essay:
Henry Fonda's,
Twelve Angry,
Jack Klugman's,
Henry Fonda,
DeStephen Hirokawa,
Ernest Bormann,
DeStephen Dirokawa,
Reginald Rose,
fonda's character,
henry fonda's character,
henry fonda's,
twelve angry,
baseball fan,
true consensus,
vote guilty,
klugman's character,
jack klugman's,
jack klugman's character,
Mike Behm,
boy guilty,
Rothwell Dan,
satisfied decision,
angry man cold,
movie twelve angry,
|
Acceptance Essays
