Atomic Diplomacy

Length: 8 Pages 2115 Words

Atomic Diplomacy Revisted: U.S. Nuclear Security Policy, Kennen to Kissenger The emergence of the United States as a dominant party in balance of power equations is a relatively new phenomenon in world history. New military technology coupled with increased global integration has allowed the United States to reinvent the fundemental assumptions of international diplomacy while propelling itself to the top of the hedgemonic stepladder. This positioning was achieved peacemeal during the course of the first two world wars, but it wasn't until the deployment of the atomic bomb that the U.S. assumed its position as a true superpower. The years that followed this unparalled ascension are the most fascinating times in the history of U.S. international relations. Hopefully, an investigation into this atomic diplomacy, along with a balanced analysis of the problems of conceptualizing and implementing containment, will provide insight for our current efforts to devise a workable post-war national security policy. There is no way to tell the sotry of post-war national security without also teling the story of George Kennen. Kennen, the formost expert of Soviet Affairs in early post-war America, is almost wholly responsbile for the policy o Continue...


More sample essays on Atomic Diplomacy

    atomic bomb
    .... was Soviet Russia. consequently used in nuclear rather assurances of atomic hostilities. and instructions diplomacy. not of of "The .... (1992 8 )

    The Cold War – USA vs. USSR – Who’s to blame?
    .... that the nuclear bomb fueled American antagonism and initiated the War, Richardson answers by pointing out that if such "atomic diplomacy" was planned when .... (1222 5 )

    Cold War
    .... This was seen as a deliberate attempt by the US. The US tried to use "Atomic diplomacy" to intimidate the SU to have free elections in Eastern Europe. .... (2180 9 )

    Who was to Blame for the Cold War?
    .... This meant that the USA would have a say in the way those countries were run. Americas Atomic diplomacy showed off their strength and power and annoyed Stalin. .... (2833 11 )

    Atomic Bomb
    .... of American lives. The atomic bomb was in no way America's first choice to ending the war; diplomacy was tried. At the Potsdam conference .... (416 2 )

The only continuing reason any nations of the nuclear club still deploy nuclear weapons is to deter hostility from other nations. Kennen was never naive enough to view the bomb as an offensive weapon. sufficent flexibility to respond to Russia with neither escalation or humiliation. Kissenger said in 1968 that "there was now no single decisive index by which the influence of states can be measured" (Kissenger 277). Whatever the answer, we can say with relative confidence that it had nothing to do with nuclear weapons. Kissenged has pinpointed the reason early in the war: "Nuclear weapons, given the constraints on their use in an approaching era of parity, were of decreasing practical utility" (Kissenger 29). The peaceful end to the crisis had shown that none of these concerns lay beyond the capacity of a "flexible response" strategy now validated by the test of practical experience. Nuclear weapons were part of an integrated system of containment and deterence. This asymmetry makes it attractive for Communists to apply limited debilitating pressures upon us in situations where we find it difficult to impose on them an equivilent price for their intrusions (Rostow 173). Truman had never considered not creating the hydrogen bomb, despite Kennen's objections. Later, Henry Kissenger would point out that in no crisis since 1962 had the strategic balance determined the outcome. Vietnam was starting for real, and the constant deployment of U.

PROFESSIONAL ESSAYS:

Atomic Bomb Development
Secretary of State James Byrnes and others who hoped, in 1945, to obtain concessions from the Soviets through "atomic diplomacy" were also woefully disappointed (4359 17 )

The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima & Nagasaki
References Alperovitz, Gar. (1987). Atomic diplomacy. New York: Penguin Books. Batchelder, RC (1961). The irreversible decision, 1939-1950. (3734 15 )

Moral Considerations and the Atomic Bomb
began, those members of the delegation who were aware of the atomic bomb had the Americans were beginning to think of the bomb in terms of diplomacy with the (6455 26 )

First Amendment and National Security
The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 specifically authorizes the silencing of the press stated: "[I]t is elementary that the successful conduct of diplomacy and the (3370 13 )

American foreign policy
this approach to some degree; he writes: ôIke volunteered to put atomic energy under that is in breach of this tradition of temperate and balanced diplomacy. (1290 5 )

Shifts in American Foreign Policy
approach to some degree; he writes: "Ike volunteered to put atomic energy under manner that is in breach of this tradition of temperate and balanced diplomacy. (1290 5 )