Guideline # 3 for "is sex necessary?"
             In this journal I express my personal opinion responding to the question "is sex really necessary?"
             "The potential for rapid reproduction is the essential evolutionary ticket for entry into the opportunistic life style" - I am so enthralled about this line
             since it can very easily give you an idea about the enormous dissimilarity that exist between the luminescent human lifestyle and the anomalistic
             idiosyncratic ("I just care about reproducing") animal behavior, it draws the huge line that separates the human being from our saxicolous four legged
             acquaintances, and that's the main issue when it comes to answering the question "is sex necessary?" I would have to say yes it definitely is but only
             when it comes to two heterosexual human beings "getting it on", and don't miss read me it doesn't have nothing to do with my concupiscent way of
             thinking I have very good reasons to believe so, when it comes to answering the question "is sex really necessary in other forms of live (general
             fauna)?" I will have to excogitate the subject for a while because I haven't been able to come up with an answer and the truth is that I am indifferent
             about it, there is a big difference between two parents planning to have a child and an animal that gives birth to more of its own kind, Animals don't
             have the capability to feel as we humans do, plus while we are concern about creating art and taking care of each other, finding time to fulfill our
             expectations of love and peace, enjoying quality time, building new civilizations, being proud of our place in the evolutionary chain, with all of our
             accoutrements and magnanimous heroes, Animals just primordially focus in reproducing, don't get me wrong I am not against their auspicious way of
             living is just that for me is not such a b...