Corporal Punishment
The Case Against Corporal PunishmentAs the crime rate in our country grows, teaching our children right from wrong is one of the most important tasks facing educators. At some point or another, this task will require some sort of disciplinary action. In years past, schools used corporal punishment to discipline children. Connie Paige reports that, "According to U.S. Department of Education statistics, more than 600,000students were struck by teachers in public schools in 1990." Studies show that in today's society, corporal punishment does more harm than good here in the United States. Many states have recognized the problems associated with corporal punishment and have begun to phase it out of their system. Still, many states especially those in the South, hold on to this outdated form of discipline. Research, coupled with the opinions of most health care professionals, indicate that there is a problem. Corporal punishment is not an effective form of discipline in schools. One of the major complaints against corporal punishment is that many educators misuse it. Discrimination is a key problem in the use of corporal punishment. According to Kreck, "Research has shown that boys are hit more often than girls; disabled students
The idea of corporal punishment is to cause pain, but pain is caused by damaging bodily tissue. If it is not the root, it is definitely an underlying factor. The witness is usually another teacher or faculty member, often with the same viewpoint as the disciplining teacher (Hagen). Corporal punishment can also be implemented to an abusive level. Bruising, hitting in the back, and hitting the legs can easily occur when spanking children. According to Kreck, these include The American Academy of Pediatrics, The National Education Association, The National Parent-Teacher Association, The American Bar Association, The American Medical Association, The Easter Seals Society, The National Coalition to Abolish Corporal Punishment in Schools, as well as many unnamed others. For example, most laws require that a witness oversee the spanking. In light of the stubbornness of some lawmakers and educators to examine the facts pertaining to corporal punishment, one might wonder if they might not be in need of a swat on the butt! ------------------------------------------------------------------------**Bibliography**. spanking teaches children that violence solves problems and stimulates more bad behavior" (Perkins). Secondly, corporal punishment teaches the wrong lesson. No one can agree on when corporal punishment begins to become abuse (Pride, 8). Kreck points out that there is no way to tell someone how hard to spank a child. In recognition of this, many national organizations oppose corporal punishment. According to Carol Kreck, most states have laws forbidding the hitting of animas, prisoners, soldiers, and mental patients. Obvio!usly this "taking sides" can lead to an unfair situation for the child.
Common topics in this essay:
Perkins Corporal,
Kreck Research,
Department Education,
Carol Kreck,
Christine Mercure,
corporal punishment,
Corporal Punishment,
Perkins Children,
Kreck Rising,
According Pride,
Punishment Alternatives,
punishment according,
corporal punishment according,
haynes 65,
perkins corporal punishment,
behavior perkins,
carol kreck,
damaging children,
children children,
form discipline,
according kreck,
punishment according kreck,
associated corporal punishment,
association american,
|
Acceptance Essays
