Biotech foods

o his reader in an unbiased fashion. His writing is more exposition than argument.

Pollan’s investigation of genetically modified food is outlined with subtitles: “Planting, Sprouting, Growing, Flowering, Meeting the Beetles,

. . .
His writing is more exposition than argument. The text becomes more personal to the reader because Pollan chooses to write in a first person point of view. By presenting both sides of the story in reference to genetically engineered foods, Pollan manages to keep an objective stance towards the issue.

Pollan never blatantly establishes whether he thinks that genetically engineered foods are safe to eat or not. “So are my New Leafs safe to eat?” (Pg 517). “’There’s still a lot we don’t understand about gene expression,’ Stark acknowledged. Rarely does Pollan give his own opinion on the issue at hand, and if he does he will immediately contradict his opinion with another fact supporting the other side of the story to maintain a neutral stance towards the topic. “The original superior potato is safe…yet I still had a question. By speaking in the first person point of view, Pollan allows the reader to feel as if they are personally going through the procedure of investigating the facts about genetically engineered foods.

Common topics in this essay:
Beetles Harvest, Rarely Pollan, God Garden, Leaf Theres, Michael Pollans, genetically engineered, engineered foods, genetically engineered foods, FDA EPA, Michael Pollan, allows reader, neutral stance, issue genetically engineered, issue genetically, stance towards, engineered foods pollan, towards issue, stance towards issue, safe eat, foods pollan, person view, neutral stance towards, Playing God, Sprouting Growing, Meeting Beetles,

Approximate Word count = 2919
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here