is adultery always wrong?
There have been many views on the subject of adultery, many reasons why a spouse would be adulterous as well as many questions linking adultery to immorality. Adultery literally refers to married persons having sexual intercourse with someone other than their spouse. Adulterous behavior can be seen to fall within the domain of morality. Richard Wasserstrom (1979) believes that there are two arguments for the immorality of adultery, these are:1) The fact the adultery involves the "breaking of a promise" - the promise of sexual exclusivity. The breaking of a promise is very hurtful to the person who is not committing the adultery. This is one of the things that both parties promise each other when they enter into marriage. 2) The immorality of adultery is also wrong as it links deception to adultery. When this connection exists it is clear that deception is wrong and therefore so is adultery. Adultery will always contain some form of deception. For example a clear case is that of the telling of lies, but deception also occurs when no lies are told, that is when he/she has sex with someone other than their spouse and simply does not tell their spouse about it, then this is still deception. There
However Mike Martin (1994) believes that Wasserstrom's rule-orientated approach to morality is an inadequate one. We have now seen three important views by Wasserstrom, Martin and Halwani on the questions surrounding adultery. As a relationship may deteriorate adultery may tend to serve as a buffer. I have very strong view on this and although I do not agree completely with one of the authors I rather agree with parts of each of their theories. " (1998) In his opinion sexual exclusivity is a promise to be a certain kind of person (sexually faithful) rather that a promise in connection with a certain act. It must be noted that this is not a commitment of what martin calls continuous strong feelings, but rather to create and sustain a relationship that is contributory to happiness. Firstly adultery is placed at the top of the list which could threaten a marriage. This promise is only an attempt to be sexually exclusive. Raja Halwani has yet another view on adultery, which is outlined, by the Kantian view.
Common topics in this essay:
Mike Martin,
Richard Wasserstrom,
Martin Halwani,
Raja Halwani,
ADULTERY WRONG,
Social Philosophy,
sexual exclusivity,
BIBLIOGRAPHY Halwani,
adultery wrong,
Immoral Wasserstrom,
immorality adultery,
commitment love,
York Macmillan,
journal social philosophy,
social philosophy,
journal social,
martin 1994,
virtue ethics,
breaking promise,
promise promise,
Journal Social,
|
Acceptance Essays
