Napster

Within this world that we live on, there is an enormous amount of people. Each of these people belongs to different cultures and societies. Every society has traits and customs that make it unique. These societies follow different moral codes. This means that they will may have different answers to the moral questions asked by our own society. What I am trying to say is that every society has a different way of analyzing and dealing with life's events, because of their cultural beliefs. This is claim is known as Cultural Relativism. Cultural Relativism is the correct view of ethics.

1. Different societies have different moral codes.

2. There is no objective standard that can be used to judge one societal code better than another.

3. The moral code of our own society has no special status; it is merely one among many.

4. There is no "universal truth" in ethics-that is, there are no moral truths that hold for all peoples at all times.

5. The moral code of a society determines what is right within that society; that is, if the moral code of a society says that a certain action is right, then that action is right, at least within that society.

6. It is mere arrogance for us to try to judge the conduct of other peoples. We should ado

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

First, because their knowledge of the earth's shape is just a simple lack of technology. These are people who are unable to accept any action that they do not believe to be moral. This societies value in Rachels mind is the same as our own western society in that we would not believe it to be right to eat "Grandma" (Pojman,1996). Education and knowledge!

are not comparable and; this analogy is wrong. This explains why different people have different moral standards because, behavior is culturally institutionalized. There is an exception to every so-called moral absolute. The elders are too feeble to contribute to the group but; they still consume precious food, which is scarce. The killing of female infants helps keep the necessary equilibrium for the survival of the group.

Rachels' theory about Cultural Relativism being based on an invalid argument is not true. This attribute is abnormal to our western society, according to Ruth. The Kwakiutls do not go out and kill at random times, they only kill to ease their soul for a dead relative (Pojman,1996). The definitions listed are words used through out the paper and can be used as a reference. The real value system is not as Rachels described it of believed cannabalism. For example, they do not accept food from the sharing of seed, even within the family group.

Above are six claims that help explain the notion of Cultural Relativism.

Approximate Word count = 1963
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.