An Argument for Euthanasia
Euthanasia is defined as, "The act or practice of putting to death painlessly a person suffering from an incurable disease." Euthanasia can be traced back as far back as the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. It was sometimes allowed in these civilizations to help others die. Voluntary euthanasia was approved in these ancient societies. Today, the practice of euthanasia causes great controversy. Both pro-life groups and right-to-die groups present arguments for their different sides. Pro-life groups make arguments and present fears against euthanasia. I contend that the case for the right to die is the stronger argument. I will begin my by listing the arguments against euthanasia and my criticism of each argument.1. Euthanasia is a violation of medical ethics. The American Medical Association has consistently condemned euthanasia as an unethical practice. Today, attitudes may be changing. Recent surveys indicate that a majority of doctors in some areas, (60% in Oregon, 56% in Michigan, and 54% in Great Britain.) favor euthanasia in extreme cases.2. Euthanasia weakens the trust relationship between the doctor and the patient. We expect doctors to heal and save lives, not to kill. I f
I believe that it is immoral of society to force caring, compassionate people to lie and go to such morbid lengths to help their patients and loved ones end their suffering. When a person decides that they prefer death rather than life, everyone would benefit if it were legal to show mercy. Some people out of desperation, use a gun or a pillow and do what they dread to do but are forced to do to end the suffering of a child, parent, or spouse. I would hope that the virtue of society would lead us to know where to draw the line between going far enough and going too far. Most people believe that there are circumstances when killing is allowed, such as self-defense. People who request euthanasia may be requesting it because they are depressed and they may change their minds. Because their primary aim is to relieve pain, these acts are considered moral. Morality does not allow us to kill, but it does require us to be compassionate and merciful. Society might put less value on giving medical assistance for the disabled, the poor, and minorities because death would be cheaper. This tells us that ending a life is not always considered wrong, depending on the circumstances. Some doctors admit that they have given heavy doses of morphine to relieve the extreme pain of terminally ill patients, knowing that such high doses will cause a quicker death. A person's independence is not absolute. These illegal acts would be entirely unnecessary if euthanasia were regulated and legalized.
Common topics in this essay:
Medical Association,
Greek Roman,
Euthanasia Euthanasia,
Premise Euthanasia,
Value Premise,
suffering patient,
patient's choice,
relieve suffering,
priority extending life,
restore health physical,
life free suffering,
heavy doses,
euthanasia causes,
primary aim,
life suffering,
death quicker,
prolong life,
restore health,
|
Acceptance Essays
