Peter Singer

To understand Peter Singer and his work, it’s helpful to examine his views on animal rights, euthanasia, and charity. Peter Singer is an Australian utilitarian philosopher and is a professor at Princeton University. His views have been evaluated by many people and have been disapproved of by many. He still to this day believes what he says should be how the world goes and he will always keep on fighting for that.

The debate over the moral status of animals continued to be one sided thinking until the 1970’s, when a large span of books and articles led to an essential and ongoing debate. Singer compared speciesism (the belief that the human race is superior to other species, and that exploitation of animals for the advantage of humans is justified) with racism and sexism, and said “there is no good reason for refusing to extend the basic principle of equality- the principle of equality consideration of interests, to non-human animals.” Singer argued specifically against eating animals and animal experimentation, and suggested that there are “nutritionally sufficient alternatives” to eating meat. Singer said “the pleasures of our palate cannot outweigh the suffering inflicted on animals by the standard procedures of comme

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

Singer still works at Princeton and he still believes all of these ideas. There are new medicines and different materials being created all the time to help people in these situations. ”

Singer says in that quote that it’s okay to kill newborn babies that are suffering from an illness or that are born severely disabled but it’s maybe not okay to kill a chimpanzee with the same mind capacity. It’s just giving up on the child and that isn’t fair. People donate out of the good will of their heart. Harming animals is very wrong but it would be a lot different if they did a test on a human and it killed them, then if they did it on an animal and it killed them. It’s not the people who have a lot of money fault that some people are poor. Only if the answer was affirmative could we claim that our readiness to use the animal was not based on a speciesist prejudice against giving that interest of non human animals a similar weight to the interests of members of our own species. Nobody should be obligated to give anyone money if it’s just donating. Singer states that abortion and painless infanticide and euthanasia can be justified in certain circumstances, for instance in the case of severely disabled infants whose life would cause suffering to both themselves and to their parents. The proportion of people living in the extreme poverty in third world countries such as China has dropped almost a half. rcial farming; making vegetarianism the only ethically acceptable diet. In the essay in the New York Times Sunday Magazine, he supports his ideas for everyday charity. But in other third-world countries such as the Sub-Saharan Africa, one out of every ten people is poor. Animals have been used for food forever.

Approximate Word count = 1359
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.