Philosophical Behaviorism
1. Philosophical behaviorism states that all facts about minds and mental states are facts about bodily behavior, and behavioral dispositions. Behaviorism is a form of materialism because behavioral facts are physical facts. A behaviorist would agree with the claim that "mental states are what cause people to behave in the way they do, and to be disposed to behave in certain ways under certain conditions." This is because the behaviorist believes that these mental states can in principal be translated into behavioral situations. The Linguistic Thesis of Behaviorism declares that statements about mental states are equivalent in meaning to statements about behavior and behavioral dispositions. This is the behaviorists attempt to attribute a mental state to a person. This however is only an attempt because there are two problems with that statement. Firstly, it evidently ignored, and even denied, the 'inner aspect' of our mental states. For example, to have a pain, is no!t just a matter of being inclined to moan and wince, say, "I have a headache," and so on. Pains also have an intrinsic qualitative nature that is revealed in introspection. There can not be a theory on mind that denies such qualia. T
"The problem with type physicalism is that the psychological constitution of a system seems to depend not on its hardware, or physical composition, but on its software, or program" (Fodder 63-64). Basically, all types of non-human beings can have human software. Materialism states that all mental states are physical states. Computers actually can pass this test. This means that the two are indistinguishable, and X passes the test that means that X is an intelligent creature with understanding and comprehension. These two things are given the same input and both output the same response. He learns how to give back cert!ain shapes in response to certain shapes given to him in the third batch. To fix each conditional by adding in the applicab!le qualification would be to reintroduce a series of mental elements into the business end of the definition, and the mental would not be described completely in terms of behavior. It also allows for situations like the silicon based Martian. In both cases his answers seem to be equally good, but in the case of the Chinese answers, he produced answers by manipulating uninterpreted formal symbols. He has also gotten very good at manipulating the Chinese symbols. According to Strong AI, the computer is not just a tool, but is a mind; if computers are given the right programs they can actually understand and have other cognitive states. Therefore, in the case of the Chinese, he acted like a computer; "I am simply an instantiation of the computer program" (Searle 71). Now he is given a third batch of symbols in English that allow him to correlate this third batch with the first two. Type materialism on the other hand says that for Riva 3every mental state type M, there is a corresponding physical state type P such that every token of M is identical to some token of P (and vice versa).
Common topics in this essay:
Strong AI,
Realizability Thesis,
Searle's Chinese,
Andrew European,
Pains Riva,
Thesis Behaviorism,
,
Artificial Intelligence,
intelligent creature,
AI Turing,
third batch,
turing test,
native speaker,
Systems Riva,
cause people behave,
understand chinese,
searle's chinese,
chinese example,
european vacation,
silicon based,
functionalism mental,
searle's chinese example,
creature understanding comprehension,
token ps type,
shapes third batch,
|
Acceptance Essays
