17th Century France vs. Britain

Though France and Britain ultimately developed two different governmental structures, they were developed to solve administrative and social problems common to both countries.

The country of France had long been an absolutist state. “In an absolutist state, sovereignty is embodied in the person of the ruler”(McKay/Hill/Buckler 531). This statement refers to the philosophy of divine right, in which the ruler is answerable only to god. Kings/Queens were given the right to rule based upon their bloodline. If a child was born into the royal family he/she would eventually rule for life. Since this turn of fate was under the control of no human force, rulers believed they were not answerable to any human. This philosophy left no room for variance or compromise within the political structure. There was no resemblance of the modern idea of “checks and balances”. Rulers made decisions, laws, and policy based upon personal beliefs and desires.

As with any system, there are pros and cons. Within an absolutist state, if the ruler is conscientious and effective he will do what is most beneficial for his constituents and the country will prosper. Opposition to the government will be at a minimum and the crown can rule efficiently wi

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

In England, after the establishment of the separate Anglican church of England there were many protestant groups left in England still in conflict. Louis XIV created a powerful monarchy that gave him absolute power. These conflicts even came to the point of bloody civil wars and suffering on both sides of the fighting.

Britain established a constitutionalist state after the decline of royal absolutism. These groups all tried to push and pull parliament in their favor, which ultimately made it so that nothing could be done. The first major point was the aftermath of the Protestant reformation. While similar pressures existed in each county, such as finances and religious differences, each responded in a manner based on the philosophies and cultures of their land. The king became the center of this new power. The king of!

France became the heart of this policy, which gave him control of religion when this went into effect. To decide which is better, it really depends on the individuals running the system of government. In a constitutional monarchy, such as in England, the King/Queen is the head of state and has some political authority, but the ultimate power rests with the electorate body. For many people, this caused more unity in England and increased power. thout having to spend its money or resources squelching rebellions. In France, the price of government had also gone up.

In Conclusion France and Britain developed different governmental structures that were meant to solve economical, social, and religious problems that existed in both countries.

Approximate Word count = 868
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.