David walker

Walker opened their minds by explaining that the white American has been keeping the slaves ignorant. A group of wealthy planters offered a ten-thousand-dollar reward for him—dead or alive. Furthermore and hypothetically speaking, the reader is a slave owner than consequently, they would be extremely agitated with Walker and want him killed, hence a disadvantage to Walker’s approach. Furthermore, the advantage previously addressed, the enlightenment of the slaves, was advantageous to the slaves and Walker.

In summation, the advantages and disadvantages of Walker’s approach to the topic of liberation from slavery was binding on the audience reading the Appeal at the given time. These are the disadvantages in that many slaves were violently beaten or killed for possessing a copy of Walker’s text and going. According to Walker addressing the white American, “And as for the greater part of the whites, it has hitherto been their greatest object and glory to keep us ignorant of our Maker, so as to be that we were made to be slaves to them and their children, to dig up gold and silver for them” (79).

------------------------------------------------------------------------

**Bibliography**

. The Appeal was written for African Americans, so my theory as to how the white man got possession of Walker’s critique is as follows. Walker enlightened his brethren about the cunning, avaricious ways of the white man and how it was inhumane and undeserved. They didn’t know better to follow the orders of their “so-called master”. He died for what he believed in, and I’m confident he is proud of that.

Disadvantages to Walker’s approach most definitely came into effect when the Appeal made it into the hands of the white, slave owner. The slave owner most probably found a copy not hidden properly, or perhaps caught the slaves assembled and reading the treatise on the plantation.