For the third paper I intend to focus on the essay topic, Can Computers Think? I will analyze the claims of the Mechanist essay and show arguments against it by logically explaining why computers cannot think.
Without a doubt, computers have greatly developed since the 1970’s and now have become essential in the daily lives of much of the world. They have come a long way from completing simple arithmetic to overcoming highly complex tasks. With such advances in technology, computers are replacing people in the workforce. The mechanist view argues that computers are intelligent like humans and therefore is the reason people could possibly lose their job to a computer. It is obvious that computers are more efficient at completing certain tasks with set rules and parameters, but to say that computers think is absurd. Thinking involves much more complicated matters then computers are capable of. There are limits and guidelines that computers must follow in order to complete any task. Without specific information on how to accomplish a job, a computer is useless. It does not have intelligence on the same level as a human mind, it cannot think. If a computer lacks information on!
a topic, it cannot obtain what it needs on
. . .
This was demonstrated in the game of chess. This has been expressed by showing faults within the mechanist view on topic followed by reasons of my own. Although computers can be programmed to do just about anything involving the data, there is no meaning and understanding of what it is doing. Indeed this is true, but I feel that computers do not understand what they are doing. Since thinking and understanding are closely related, computers are incapable of thinking. But it must not be thrown out of perspective, the computer cannot think. It just is not capable of doing so. It is reasonable to state that such factors that can influence a conclusion are not all programmed into a computer. There are strict rules and guidelines that must be followed. They are merely programmed on what to do. Understanding something requires thinking, and computers cannot think. This shows a way that computers are not capable of thinking. The reason they are capable of increasing performance is because chess is a game of limits. Unless a computer was previously programmed with all the possible influences that may affect an outcome, it would have reached it maximum capability and no longer be abl!
e to fulfill the assignment.
Approximate Word count =
956
Approximate Pages =
4 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|
