None_Provided
Topic: The Technology for genetic modification of organisms is still unrefined. As such, countries should not modify organisms until the technology becomes watertight. Do you agree? The age of the new generation genetic engineering has come. Genetic engineering is envisioned by many people as a panacea, a cure-all formula for mankind's pains and sufferings. From antibiotics, new vaccines, pesticides-resistant plants to biochips, bioengineered weapons, diagnostic kits, pharmaceuticals and now, the mapping of human genome, genetic engineering provides an almost unlimited number of applications. It is not surprising, then, that over the past years since the first gene was cloned, industrialized countries has become so engrossed with experimental studies related to genetic engineering. In the United States alone, "the Office of Technology Assessment identified 403 companies engaged in research and development activities spending approximately $1.5 to $2 billion annually" (cited in Fox, 1992, p.13). Following the US in the race for technological edge are Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, Switzerland and France (Fox, 1992). Amidst the excitement, however, numerou!
Do you agree? Introduction The age of the new generation genetic engineering has come. "A promising research, [for instance], is underway for implanting pig cells into humans for the treatment of diabetes, Parkinson's disease and Huntington's chorea" (Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 2000). To improve the milk yield of cows, reduce fat in pigs, and increase wool growth in sheep, for instance, genetic engineers make use of bovine somatotropin or BST hormone gene (British Medical Association, 1992). So far, only a small proportion is transformed using this procedure and offspring are found to consist both of normal and transgenic animals (Fincham, 1990). So far, only a small proportion is transformed using this procedure and offspring are found to consist both of normal and transgenic animals (Fincham, 1990). Some changes in the genetic make up of animals may at the same time produce side effects that will make them more susceptible to other diseases. Although scientists maintain that most of genes are just copies of the original DNA, people's belief should still be respected and considered.
Common topics in this essay:
Medical Association,
France Fox,
Topic Technology,
God Scientists,
Fincham Ravetz,
United Kingdom,
British Medical,
Conclusion Indeed,
Techniques Limitations,
Technology Assessment,
genetic engineering,
british medical,
genetic modification,
british medical association,
association 1992,
medical association,
medical association 1992,
genetic engineering technology,
engineering technology,
transgenic animals,
fincham 1990,
fox 1992,
genetically modified,
genetic modification animals,
genetic modification organisms,
|