Biological Disaster
Picture that there are two people who decide to have a child. They discussed and settled upon allowing nature to decide how their child will turn out. Time passed and once again they wanted another child, but this time they choose to let science do the deciding. They scheduled an appointment with a doctor to decide on characteristics such as hair and eye color, intelligence, height, and sex. As more time passed the natural born child was more and more an example to the family as to what science had done for their second child. Child number two grew much faster, was physically stronger, and excelled more rapidly in school, in comparison to their first born. As a result of this advancement, the father began to take a special interest in the younger child and soon began ignoring the other child. The older child had a special interest in becoming an astronaut, but because he had a heart problem and lacked the estimate of long life, he was never permitted to pursue his dream!s. Society did not want a liability in work and choose not to take a chance on someone that might not work out intellectually or physically. No matter how much he studied or how much he trained, he was not accepted by the overwhelming society of people
Wendy McGoodwin, the executive director of the Council for Respons!ible Genetics in Cambridge, Mass. Science may grant a world of filled with more intelligent, healthy, and attractive people. With that statement we arise with the question of trying to prevent science, thereby limiting scientist and technological advancements thus limiting mankind's natural evolution is a question no on can answer. The challenges he faced because of the rejection modern society have given him since birth. The question to test and how people will for it goes back to whether or not to discrimination will happen as a result of testing and manipulation not developing. " DNA manipulation increases the chance of discovering vaccines for diseases previously uncured. What about the mothers that that decide give up their unborn child for adoption, then later wants the child back after it has already been living with adoptive parents for quite some time? Immediately the courts must get involved and dispute which parents' needs will be meet, not what is the best possible situation for the child. This tale is a brief summary of the movie Gattaca. No amount of science can keep a person from their desire to better themselves. How will society be balanced with employment? Will people evolve to such lengths that nobody wants to flip burgers or work as a garbage man? Will they be forced into a specific job at birth due to their genetic makeup showing an undesirable future? Since the science of genetic engineering is so new, people can't be 100 percent sure about what type of situations they are creating. Through genetic engineering society develops a chance to achieve wonders in the medical field. The HIPAA explicitly states that a presymptomatic genetic diagnosis does not qualify as a preexisting condition, thereby offering a degree of protection to some patients seeking presymptomatic testing (White, Callif-Daley, and Donnelly 2). With crime today there is no guarantee that these powerful advances would be safe from evil intent. The entire purpose of studying medicine is to provide treatments to cure problems for people.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Genetic Frontier,
Callif-Daley Donnelly,
Mother Nature,
Robert Oppenheimer,
Cambridge Mass,
Genetic Fro,
Public Concerns,
Medical School,
Von Neumann,
genetic engineering,
genetic discrimination,
decide child,
white callif-daley,
white callif-daley donnelly,
callif-daley donnelly,
callif-daley donnelly 2,
genetically altered,
genetic makeup,
discrimination ibed,
child child,
medical field,
gene human spirit,
genetic discrimination ibed,
|
Acceptance Essays
