Can They Be Reconciled?
Where do humans come from? This question has been asked for many years and there is still no answer yet. There are a lot of divergent views of human origin especially between scientific and religious people. These divergent views can't be reconciled and there is no need to do so. Also, there is no possible compromise for these views. That because the religious and scientific people are looking to the situation in different way, answering the question differently depend on their view, and depending on different materials to support their view, so they will never agree with each other. In my essay I will contrast the divergent view between Galileo reading " Letter to the Grand Duchess" which persuade us not believing any theories because we didn't experiment it which mean that we can not belief any theory about human origin; and Hazen and a Trefil reading " Evolution" who are beliefs in the evolution theories because it has a lot of evidence that supported like fossil, cells, a!nd molecules. And Evolution is the topic that I'm going to focus on it in my writing.Galileo view is that people must not belief everything even if it h
In my opinion I agree with Galileo than we can't prove theory with out experiment, so we can 't belief the evolution theory that because as Galileo said that scientists some time notice that their own prove and evidence are wrong. Also, the human origin is secret and God is the only one who knows about it and we can't know this secret if don't want us to know it. But reasoning is like racing and not like hauling, and a single Arabian steed can outrun a hundred plow horses. Beside that the others writes about the first cell which they belief that all the diversity of life on earth- tree, human, and others- evolved from the first cell and Darwin process " nature selection or the survival of the fittest" is one of the process that !make the theory strong. The first is by Hazen and trafil, they beliefs in evolution theory because it has a lot of evidences that make it possible like the cell, the molecules, and the fossils even if the theory it doesn't prove yet. " So from what Galileo said we understand that we can belief what theories says about human origin because we didn't see it by ourselves and we didn't experiment it even if there are a lot of evidences, but we can not prove it. The first stage-chemical evolution- encompasses the origin of life . Also, some times the scientists themselves see that their own observation and proofs are wrong. as a lot of fact and reasoning to belief and they must belief what they experiment by themselves and he gave an example in social live about that which is " just as several horses can haul more sacks of grain than one can. The second view is Galileo, which state that we cannot belief any theory if we didn't experiment it even if it has evidence. In summary, there are different and diverges view about the human origin and no one knows whose view is right or who is wrong and we can't reconcile these disparate views.
Common topics in this essay:
Trefil Evolution,
Hazen Trefil,
,
Grand Duchess,
Mentor Seminar,
human origin,
evolution theory,
didn't experiment,
Letter Grand,
MA Mentor,
ma mentor seminar,
letter grand duchess,
human origin hazen,
steps process,
belief theory,
view galileo,
evidence evolution,
beliefs evolution,
ma mentor,
mentor seminar,
|
Acceptance Essays
