Telecommuting: The Good, The Bad, and the Government
Organizations are increasingly using telecommuting as a way to increase productivity and decrease costs. Employees also see positive results from telecommuting. Research shows however that there are negative sides as well. Governmental intervention beginning in the early 1990s almost put an end to telecommuting, but after debate, telecommuting has proven stronger than expected. Telecommuting: The Good, The Bad, and The GovernmentParents today face increased burdens as the cost of living continues to rise. Many single parent homes are troubled with the problem of caring for their children and working at the same time. Many rely on babysitters and family members to help, but others look to the government for assistance. In any case, meeting the bills is hard enough without the cost of a babysitter. However, today there is another choice: Telecommuting has become a new way for business organizations to employ people to work out of their homes that will keep up with the more fast paced society than the earlier modes communications. There are issues to issues to be overcome with telecommuting as well, but those issues are not as costly to those involved, usually. ITAC (International Telework Association & Coun
What tomorrow holds for telecommuters is unclear, all we can do today is examine and adjust the good, the bad, and the government. The organization experiences positive factors in the forms of higher productivity, reduced physical plant costs, selling point for new employees, and the ability to accommodate disabled or chronically ill employees (McQuarrie p. According to Fiona McQuarrie (1994) there is rarely any mention in the telecommuting literature of the possibility of the employer compensating the employee for home-based work by paying a portion of rent, mortgage, or utility costs (p 82). The organization and the employee must review these factors to determine if this organizational workforce design is right for them. Many telecommuters have expressed desire to return to their old arrangement of closer interactions with other employees. After debates between opposing sides of the issue, another issue concerning the liability arose questioning the safety telecommuters' children in terms of hazards from the workplace. Employers work to curb telecommuter liability risks. The lack of a coordinated workweek affects multiple employees because one employee's work may depend on the completion of work by another employee. The problems of isolation and loss of direction control have been solved by requiring the employee to commute to a central office or an organizational hub usually two days a week. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 64 (4), 4.
Common topics in this essay:
Fiona McQuarrie,
Health Administration,
Service Administration,
Heritage Foundation,
Government Parents,
Association Council,
According McQuarrie,
Kelley Hill,
Abstract Organizations,
Business Journal,
home offices,
gainey kelley hill,
occupational safety health,
negative factors,
factors include,
concerning liability,
larger workforce,
mcnerney 1995,
lack coordinated workweek,
positive factors,
health administration,
direct control,
safety health administration,
safety health,
|
Acceptance Essays
