media censorship
Why does anyone care if our society is aggressive? Does the kid who decides to fire a gun into his school do so because he watched Natural Born Killers? Is violence in our communities really causing anyone any abnormal amount of heartache? To the victims, and the families and friends of the victims, surely it does. Perhaps there are still some individuals who care just for the sake of caring, not because they are grieving a loss. But what does it all mean, and what is causing it? Some will point fingers at their televisions and movie theatres and assert that they are to blame. Not being one in the habit of pointing fingers and making absurd accusations, I will explain the free will of man and his inalienable rights to free speech. To censor television and motion pictures because of one faction's set of morals is earily similar to book burning. Censorship of media messages is an explicit violation of our constitutionally protected right to expression, and as such, shou!ld not be looked to as a solution for modern-day violence in society. The First Amendment states; "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press." (Jefferson, US Constitution). We are an enlightened population well-versed
Censorship of images of violence in the media by the government concedes one's personal decision over what images are appropriate to view. It is not the role of our government to guide us to live lives based on one particular sect's definition of morality. , The United States Handicapper General enforces the law of complete equality. Entertainment filled with blood, murder, rape and assault that is viewed for pleasure. It becomes our duty to explain responsible viewing. The role of the government is to protect our rights, not to appoint Morality Generals who decide what is best for us. 5 children, a golden retriever, and a home in the suburbs. To control the free exchange of thoughts, ideas, and social and moral inquiry, is to severely handicap the intellect of our society. It is one's personal responsibility to be accountable for what images and themes they accept. In the novel Welcome to the Monkey House, by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. It is not reasonable to think that a single, shared definition of "appropriate" can be reached concerning media messages. in the understanding of our constitutionally protected natural rights. Labeling violent themes as 'inappropriate' limits a writer's repertoire to plot lines filled only with passivity.
Common topics in this essay:
Island Nations,
United Handicapper,
Night Censorship,
Ford Explorer,
Freedom Speech,
Born Killers,
Paternalistic Moralism,
Morality Generals,
William Shakespeare,
,
media messages,
constitutionally protected,
violence society,
violence media,
freedom expression,
motion pictures,
constitutionally protected expression,
solution modern-day,
looked solution,
protected expression,
looked solution modern-day,
modern-day violence,
violation constitutionally protected,
media messages explicit,
explicit violation constitutionally,
|
Acceptance Essays
