The President of the United States or the British Prime Minister
             The comparison of the US President and the British Prime Minister appears from the onset, to provide some interesting political differences. In recent years, the public has become acutely aware of the potential, and arguably the need, for personal leadership in the midst of its political system. This represents a major change in perceptions and values, for the form of government, which has traditionally been distinguished by its collegiate and impersonal nature. The British system is based upon the constitutional doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, the political principle of a representative democracy drawn from a mass electorate, and on an operational ethos of party loyalty, collective cabinet responsibility and a professional civil service. The American presidency is a topic that attracts both widespread and intense interest. As a respective position of the political system, it represents a mainstream branch of a constitutional system with the support of a judicial b!
             ranch and a legislative branch. Yet these attractions may have inhibiting effects on the scientific and theoretical development of the subfield. Perhaps more than any other subfield, the issues of the conduct of the president and the prime minister seem stuck in a temporal context that constrains larger generalizations or inquiries. The attention of this topic tends to focus on that of the normative judgments with empirical descriptions of behavior. This research will entail a
             since the President holds the position of Head of State as well as Head of Government. The Prime Minister, it would appear, has more influence in domestic, able to dominate his part, legislature and to an extent, executive branch. The US President, on the other hand, appears to have the position of supremacy in domestic politics, known as the chief legislator and dominates his executive, though part control is li...