napster

sales. This is what the RIAA is targeting. But the problem herein lies in what people do with the technology. Napster provides the means but it's the people who infringe copyrights. If you look at it, a VCR can be Napster. Illegal copies can be made but is the VCR illegal? It's all in the eye of the beho

. . .
The rare version of the song is the one unencumbered by the time restraints that was put upon the maximum length album.

Positive Uses

Trial basis

Backup

Rarities

In my humble opinion, there is nothing wrong with getting the album or selected songs for a trial period. com lawsuits but if the facts are correctly stated, the RIAA might think twice about trying to control someting that they aren't even entitled to. This has been how I have been operating since about 1998. I was ecstatic to find this and I have Napter to thank.

Besides the first two advantages of Napster and MP3 in general provides, there is yet another; the availability of rare songs. Coincedentally, the RIAA is suing

them as well. lder and from this eye, it's the people who the RIAA should be after, not Napster or

MP3.

Conclusion

Only time and a jury will decide the outcome of the Napster/MP3. This took MUCH longer but I still abided by my code. Bare in mind this was before I had a cable modem (savior) and the advent of Napster.

The RIAA sees the negative effects and only the negative ones.

Common topics in this essay:
Napster MP3, Napster Wrong, Torn Load, Backup Rarities, Napster Illegal, MP3com RIAA, Using Napster, Coincedentally RIAA, Positive Trial, rare songs, using napster, it's people, napster mp3,

Approximate Word count = 568
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here