hackers
Precis of 'Who's reading your E-mail" by Richard BeharsThe article exposes the vulnerability of computer data and ofcorporations with the popularity of the Internet. The Internet canallow hackers access to any computer in the world, with understatedease. Break-ins can go virtually undetected Major corporations and government security departments have acknowledged that hacker break-ins are out of control. Some companiesare too fearful to join networks because of this. Software programsbrought out to deal with the growing problem, such as firewalls, are nolonger totally effective. New technology has been developed such as''Pilot Network Services' (offering supervised Internet access);'Netranger' (a monitor device used by Pentagon) and 'Encrypton'The basics of computer security (using difficult passwords, andguarding of data) are not being met in a disturbingly large number ofAmerican companies surveyed. A new bill demands that system operatorsbecome responsible for security. Hackers can be prosecuted (withsubsequent heavy penalties) only if the exposed company has activelyshown that it was security conscious. Further more, exposed companies
Precis of 'Hackers: Taking a byte out of computer crime' by W. Hackers comprised of young, computer literate andrebellious gangs vying for the status symbol image and thrill ofbreaking into a computer network. The government droppedthe charges after 4 days and it was declared a mistrial. In addition, Neidorf argued that if the E911 text had been a sensitivedocument, it certainly was not treated or secured as such by Bellcorp. Fear is also a motivating factor forcorporations in refusing to join networks, allocating enormous fundsfor security measures; restricting access to information; and utilizingpasswords to deter alien entry. They also suggest thatinvasions are understated because many companies do not even realizethey have been corrupted. The court casewas centered on an article about the countries E99 emergency system,and how he managed to fraudulently obtain a highly sensitive documentwhich was then published with the intent to disrupt or halt allservices. These hackers lovecomputers and are motivated by the anger and frustration they feel atthe prevailing laxity of security measures in place. Roush and Behar point out that the most basic ofmeasures, use of a difficult password, was sadly lacking in manycompanies surveyed. In ConclusionThe articles demonstrate from different perspectives the growingproblem associated with the rapid rise in computer networks. Hacking is very much out of control. Furthermore, it was found that the supposed sensitivedocument (E911) was readily available elsewhere. Hacking crime is now far more sophisticated, varied and costly tosociety. These hackers are acknowledged by non-hackers with areluctant acceptance. The author had taken a keen interest in the case due to theimplications it had on threats against freedom of the electronic press.
Common topics in this essay:
Roush Behar,
Roush Roush,
Phrack Internet,
Network Services',
Foundation EFF,
Neidorf' Denning,
Bellcorp Denning,
Internet Internet,
Liberties Neidorf,
Denning Behar,
security measures,
denning's article,
sensitive document,
roush behar,
ready market expertise,
ready market,
craig neidorf',
responsibility security,
convicted hackers,
taking byte computer,
market expertise,
'the united vs,
utilizing expertise,
united vs craig,
byte computer crime',
|
Acceptance Essays
