Moral and Ethical Implications of Breast Implants
The Moral and Legal Obligations of Breast Implants In a world that revolves around impressions, many people that it is very important to look your best at all times. We are constantly seeing images of the "perfect body". From Barbie to Baywatch, American women are constantly being shown images of girls with eighteen inch waists, thirty two inch hips and a D cup chest. Feeling as if they need to achieve this image to be attractive, women flock to the exercise gym in large numbers. They spend two hours a day exercising to achieve that tiny waistline that they desire. They are not satisfied with the chest that God gave them so they also want to alter this aspect of their body. In the past, women did chest exercises to enhance their bustline. As they got smarter, they realized that all that they were doing is enlarging the muscle and in fact minimizing their bustline. In today's age of technology, scientist have developed a way to surgically inhance the size of women's bustlines. By surgically inserting silicone bags i!nto the breast, women everywhere had the opportunity to achieve the most desirable bustline. A surgery originally intended for reconstructive purposes, by 1990 eighty percent of all implants
With reports of leaky and ruptured bags, the number of new surgeries began to drop. Though the FDA classified implants as a "Class II" devise, not requiring testing, it is still the responsibility of the company to make sure that they are not endangering human lives by the use of their product. Because of their hasti!ness, the company overlooked such variables as the effect of silicone on the body and the lifetime of the "bag" that the silicone was stored in. Case Against the Thesis The Dow Chemical Company feels that they are not responsible for the punitive damages inflicted amongst the patients. This allows the responsibility burden to be lifted off of the shoulders of the company and on to the shoulders to the consumers thems!elves. They were legally able to sell their product without testing it for any known health concerns. Though the results did not come out to be one hundred percent on way, the overwhelming majority of the juries say that the sole burden of responsibility belongs on the manufacturing company. Rebuttal The company is wrong in its theory of why it is not responsible for the damages caused by the ruptured breast implants. The one deals with safety and warranties. If considering safety requires a large part of their budget to be dilapidated, then the company will more than likely disregard safety considerations. The women who experienced these problems deserve to be compensated. Since the side effects were unknown to the women prior to the surgery, it should be Dow Chemicals responsibility to compensate the patients for their troubles. This dream surgery quickly turned into a nightmare. Women took it upon themselves to have tests done to see if these ruptured bags were in any way shape or form dangerous to their health. Allegations were made that the implants were responsible for muscle and joint pain, weight loss, and fatigue along with several severe autoimmune disorders.
Common topics in this essay:
Dow Chemical,
Class II,
Baywatch American,
Conclusion United,
II Thesis,
Class III,
Chemical Company,
IV Rebuttal,
Implants Thesis,
dow chemical,
Dow Chemicals,
hundred percent,
responsible damages,
breast implants,
hard core,
hundred percent fail,
fail free,
silicone implants,
ruptured bags,
percent fail,
product market,
percent fail free,
manufacturer responsible damages,
damages caused ruptured,
breast augmentation surgeries,
|
Acceptance Essays
