The Fourth Amendment Yields To Technology
The Fourth Amendment Yields To TechnologyOregon resident David Kyllo and his wife were suspected of growing and distributing marijuana. US agent William Elliot became skeptical of Kyllo while investigating his original target. Kyllo's unusually high electrical bill stirred the law enforcer's suspicion. On January 16, 1992 sergeant Daniel Haas (National Guard) discovered an immense amount of heat emitted from Kyllo's high intensity growing lamps. Through the use of an Agema 210 thermal imager Haas was able to collect molecular information without a warrant. (New York Times 2/21/01) The fourth amendment of the constitution gives an American the right to be secure within their home. This right can only be over ridden w
(Chicago Sun-Times, 3/7/01) During this era of technology walls no longer secure our privacy. The government will attempt to uphold privacy, until it deprives law enforcers of doing their job. The police had the right to sit outside Kyllo's house with or without a thermal imager. " (USA Today 2/21/00) Lerner suggested that the police should have to obtain a warrant prior to the use of "spying" techniques beyond the human senses. (USA Today 2/21/00) !Ed Yahnke of the American Civil Liberties Union thinks that law enforcement should have reasonable suspicion before they use invasive technology. (Chicago Sun-Times, 3/7/01) The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the warrant-less use of thermal imagers. Kyllo was convicted of growing marijuana with high intensity lamps. His lawyer Kenneth Lerner said, "allowing police to monitor thermal radiation from homes, strips us of our most basic boundary of personal privacy. (USA Today 2/21/00) The lawyer agreed that a person forfeits their right to privacy if they stand in front of their window. (New York Times 2/21/01) Conclusively, if a person's heat is not private, no warrant is necessary to indicate heat. ------------------------------------------------------------------------**Bibliography**. They used a "non-intrusive device, which emits no rays or beams and shows a crude visual image of the heat being radiated. Dreeben, a deputy solicitor claims that it is not reasonable to expect a person's heat to be private. The thermal detection was legally used from a public road in order to detect illegal operations. He challenged the warrant-less use of thermal imaging, because he thought that it violated his fourth amendment right.
Common topics in this essay:
York Times,
Kenneth Lerner,
Liberties Union,
Supreme Court,
Chicago Sun-Times,
National Guard,
William Elliot,
Michael Dreeben,
David Kyllo,
fourth amendment,
times 2/21/01,
york times,
york times 2/21/01,
Technology Oregon,
usa 2/21/00,
chicago sun-times 3/7/01,
sun-times 3/7/01,
chicago sun-times,
warrant-less thermal,
heat private,
search warrant,
person's heat private,
probable cause,
|
Acceptance Essays
