Legalizing drugs or not
The question to legalize drugs is not a hard one. Drugs are one of the most common used illicit items in the United States today. Legalizing drugs or not has been questioned and discussed so often on television, books, and newspapers. Gore Vidal noted in "Drugs" "Simply make all drugs available and sell them at cost." However, simply because of the lack of researching and the misunderstanding of the usage and effect of drugs, the writer misdirected his readers on the issue of drug legalization. First of all, writer pointed out that marijuana is actually not dangerous. However, earlier research has found that smoking marijuana increases the chance of developing cancer of the head or neck. In fact, marijuana smoke contains 50 to 70 percent more carcinogenic hydrocarbons than tobacco smoke does. People who smoke marijuana inhale more deeply and hold their breath longer than tobacco smokers do, which increases the lung's exposure to carcinogenic smoke.
Imagine what will happen if the government would allow murder, drag racing, raping, and speeding. Does this really solve the problem? Do not say they are much serious crimes when it has the same outcome as drugs - someone will die from it, it is just the matter of time. Does not the usage of drugs interfere others pursuit of happiness? When a person use drugs, there is always someone who is not happy about it for sure, the person maybe his/her parents, relatives, friends; that person may even be people around him/her that he/she doesn't know. Experts who worked on the Center for substance Abuse Treatment project consider however consider marijuana both psychologically and physiologically addictive. These are also things that some people like to do too. Not just drugs, nothing can possibly meet that requirement. As many would probably point out that the United State was the creation of men who believed that each man has the right to do what he wants with his own life as long as he does not interfere with his neighbor's pursuit of happiness. Vidal should read the Chinese proverb "cut the toe to escape the bite of ant" which means to do something that makes the problem seems disappear but the problem is still there but just in a different way. It is actually a loop hole on the Bill of Rights because this could never happen. Over 52 percent of the youthful marijuana users who were involved in this project were shown to have dependence problem after using marijuana which rejects writer's idea of marijuana as non-addictive substances and proves that the writer is misleading his reader on the drug legalization issue. It doesn't help to improve drug usage or drug addiction situation. that, unquestionably, smoking marijuana may increase the risk of cancer more than smoking tobacco and cause great damage to the body which rejects the writer's idea of "marijuana is not dangerous". Doesn't this already interfere others pursuit of happiness?The writer also mentioned in the essay that every man should have the right to do what he likes and forbidding him from doing what he likes makes him wants those things all the more.
Common topics in this essay:
Drugs Simply,
Bill Rights,
Abuse Treatment,
Maybe Vidal,
,
United Legalizing,
drug legalization,
pursuit happiness,
Gore Vidal,
Experts Center,
issue drug legalization,
writer's idea marijuana,
interfere pursuit happiness,
smoking marijuana,
he/she doesn't,
legalizing drugs,
interfere pursuit,
rejects writer's,
idea marijuana,
writer's idea,
issue drug,
rejects writer's idea,
|
Acceptance Essays
