Television Violence on the Balance
As sensitive as this issue is, I believe it can be addressed. My report shows that some progress has already begun in several areas. Attention needs to be focused on how and why some programming has begun to move in the right direction and why the rest has not. "What this issue needs, more than anything else, is cool heads on all sides of the problem: the network executives, the creative community, the government, researchers and advocacy groups. All sides need to worry less about how each development affects only them and instead look at the needs of everyone. In the broadcast world, the Big Four television networks, i.e. ABC, CBS, FOX, and NBC, have begun to get the public message about television violence. The programming they completely control, series and television movies, has, for the most part shown some promising signs and now reflects, on the whole, relatively few issues of concern as compared to other network television formats. I contend that this is a result of consumer pressure, rather than governmental regulation. The violence contained in the most disturbing television series is minor in comparison to that contained in theatrical films shown on network television. And that violence, edited as it . . .
" (UCLA 17) Network affiliates must put pressure on the networks. Include the network's development executives in these discussions. 2888 3) After decades probing the issue in one congressional committee after another, it is time to acknowledge, emphatically, that the simple choice is between censorship and responsible voluntary conduct. The committee chairman, Senator Earnest Hollings (D-S. Even after coming under intense congressional pressure in the mid-1970s to study and possibly step into this policy quagmire, the Commission pointedly rejected any direct governmental role in overseeing television violence: "As a practical matter, it would be difficult to construct rules which would take into account all of the subjective considerations involved in making such judgments. Children's Television Act of 1990, Pub. Whether or not there ultimately is a V-Chip, look at devices such as The Telecommander or TV Guardian that not only controls which programs your children watch, but how much television and at what times. Ultimately, however, it was the regulatory framework established by the Communications Act of 1934 and a belief and trust in the strong private broadcasting system that has been allowed to evolve within that framework that proved most crucial. Teachers can be more media literate and include these concepts in their teaching.
Common topics in this essay:
House Senate, Communications Act, Arts Sciences, World War, FOX NBC, Improvement Act, Communication Act, Practices Standards, ABC NBC, Tech Ed, cong 1st, 1st sess, violence television, cong 1st sess, television violence, sess 1993, act 1990, 1st sess 1993, 103d cong 1st, 103d cong, 1993 introduced, watch television, sess 1993 introduced, television industry, improvement act 1990, |