Contrast of Plutarch's Lives of Sulla and Caesar
             An interesting, but dramatic understanding of roman history can be reached by analyzing the differences in the Lives of Sulla and Caesar, specifically the effect and uses of money during their rise to power. Plutarch's writings give insight on not only those great men, but on Plutarch himself. The use of money, either for bribery, compensation of soldiers, or public displays was instrumental in both men's lives. Sulla's greediness and love of vulgarity is characterized, as well as Caesar's generosity towards supporters who were running for office. Sulla rejected his hereditary poverty and flaunted his wealth in lewd ways, while Caesar's noble beginnings are shown by his more stylish way of handling financial matters.
             Analysis of any of Plutarch's works must be qualified by the idea that he is not a historian, but had an in depth knowledge of ancient history that he presupposes his readers to have (Scardigli 67). His accounts have more to do with character and morals than with historical significance. Since he lived and wrote after these events had taken place, he had no particular agenda to fulfill. As said by Plutarch, "So very difficult a matter it is to trace and find out the truth of anything by history, when, on one hand, those who afterwards write it find long periods of time intercepting their view, and, on the other hand, the contemporary records of any actions and lives, partly through envy and illwill, partly through favour and flattery, pervert and distort the truth." (Fuller II). This quote generally summarizes his attitude towards actual chronological history. He was more interested in the drama of each individual's success or failure (Plutarch 8).
             With regard to this, connections can be found between Sulla's failures and immorality with his use of his monetary
             ...