None_Provided
The depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory has been replicated in this experiment. According to this theory, words that are processed more deeply will produce higher recall rates than words that have not been processed on a deeper level. Forty undergraduate college students of different age, sex and background were tested using three levels of processing. Participants had to quickly respond by hitting Yes/No keys on the keyboard if they had previously seen the words flashed on the computer monitor. A paired t-test was used and it showed a significant difference between the three compared groups. The results of this experiment show that words that had the highest recognition scores were at the level of processing that involved, Is the word in the category____? The other two levels of processing that were tested, namely, Does the word rhyme with_____? and Is the word in capital letters? had smaller recognition rates. This finding is consistent !with the hypothesis that the deeper the level of processing, the more the participants will remember the words and recall them later.Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words Depth of processing and the retention of words refers
Gracsser & Nakamura (1982) did a study on memory structure in the processing of advertisement messages using two models of memory structure-schema-copy-plus-tag (as cited in Hunt & Kernan, 1992 ) and associative-network/depth-of-processing by Craik and Lockhart, (1972) and Hastie & Kumar (1979) ( as cited in Hunt and Kernan, 1992) were tested in a 2 x 2 between-subjects design. This experiment is improved because there were six counter-balanced versions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684. Hastie & Kumar, (1979) proposed an Associative-Network/Depth-of-Processing theory (as cited in Hunt & Kernan, 1992) where depth of processing deals with the encoding and representation of information. If a subject shallowly processes a word or does not know its meaning, then the chances of him or her recalling that word during a test would decrease. This theory proposes that it would be difficult for the participant to determine whether or not a certain typical item appeared in the actual message and may lead the participant to falsely recognize more typical than atypical arguments as having appeared in the message. They performed data-driven implicit task, and conceptually-driven implicit task, which involves priming in general knowledge. They found that the smaller the sets of associates, which are highly interconnected, produced greater recall rates. In connection to Gracsser and Nakamura's 1982 experiment testing typical vs.
Common topics in this essay:
Schreiber McKinney,
Thapar Greene,
Gracsser Nakamura,
Schreiber McKinney's,
Hunt Kernan,
Procedure Participants,
,
INSERT TABLE,
Words Depth,
Thapar's Greene's,
level processing,
depth processing,
bennett gee,
nelson bennett,
bennett gee schreiber,
nelson bennett gee,
gee schreiber,
gee schreiber mckinney,
schreiber mckinney,
mckinney 1993,
schreiber mckinney 1993,
hunt kernan,
implicit memory,
typical atypical,
word capital letters,
|
Acceptance Essays
