Technology in Education
The challenging process of educating is in demanding need for solutions on how technology will change education. Society seems to be fascinated by the eruption of technological advancements in the educational field. In 1981 about eighteen percent of U.S. public schools had one computer for instructional use. By 1991 that percentage increased to ninety-eight percent (Alhalabi p.22). Technology has changed and will change many ideas of education the potential of educational systems captivates the lives of many students and teachers.The effects of technology in the classroom are related to both the teacher and the students. In the past classrooms were lecture driven. With technology involved in education, the students are more active in their learning. The teacher is no longer the center of attention. They play the role of a facilitator or guide of information and not so much of an information source. Technology in the classroom allows the students to be more active with the opportunity of communication of information. By being active the students are then more likely to generate their own choices on how to obtain, manipulate, or display information (Bridgforth). This gives students a higher confidence level.
Technologies also give an opportunity for students and teachers to learn from a broader perspective of learning other skills. As I researched this topic with great interest I realized that the information was interesting. The study showed that with adequate teacher preparation technology greatly improved many aspects of the classroom, such as: teaching of abstract concepts and problem solving, as well as basic skills, Independent work, teamwork and collaborative inquiry, adaptation of instruction to accommodate student learning styles and special needs, less teacher lecture, with more student-centered classrooms. An observation that is very interesting is not only the involvement and motivation students tend to show, but the ability to complete work at a faster pace. This shows many positive things for the learning process, but this could lead to procrastination. gove/pubs/EdReformStudeies/EdTech/effectsstudents. ------------------------------------------------------------------------**Bibliography**Works CitedAlhalabi, Bassem, Hamza Khalid; Technology and Education: Between Chaos and Order; 2000 First Monday CorporationBridgforth, Elizabeth; Technology Policy, Research & Planning, Information & Recourses: www. I also believe that students will become more motivated by having project-based learning. The most highly rated incentives for using telecommunications with students included expanded students' awareness about the world, accessing information that would otherwise be difficult to obtain, therefore, increasing students' interest. Some people might argue that the success of non-technology based learning is because students must show planning, cooperation and well-defined and relevant project goals. The Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) conducted a comprehensive nation-wide assessment at the request of the Senate and House Committees on Education and Labor. This is definitely a problem that can be overcome through history search or web blocking. Project-based learning is more student-centered rather than the teacher facilitating information to the student. Another concern educators had in the beginning of the technological advancements was the loss of focus of the educational mission.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Penuel Means,
Technology Education,
Education Labor,
Bridgeforth Students,
Office Education,
Means Wenglinsky,
Assessment OTA,
Bridgforth OTA,
Education Chaos,
project-based learning,
technology education,
effects technology,
students active,
technology classroom,
effects technology classroom,
non-technology based,
technological advancements,
students motivated,
center technology,
students active learning,
penuel means,
|