tit 9
How has Title IX changed university life and college athletics in the United States? Well, as stated earlier, legislation was passed with the purpose of ending sexual discrimination, whether it is academically or athletically. Title IX clearly states, "No person in the U.S. shall, on the basis of sex be excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal aid." So, the 1972 bill gave women the boost needed to help them succeed both in the classroom and on the field. The legislation sounds to be completely ethical and just, but the problem lies in the fact that in recent years men have been subjected to "reverse discrimination" because of the strong enforcement of Title IX. The academic effects of Title IX on women have been immense. Since its passage, women have been given more opportunity to gain both college and professional degrees and have run with it. For instance, in a 1994 study women attained 38% of medical degrees. A dramatic increase from the mere 9% earned in 1972. The same study, proved that women earned 43% of law degrees, compared with 7% in 1972. As the First Circuit Cou
In 1993-94 women made up 58 percent of postsecondary vocational education students. In 1972, the rate of men graduating with nursing degrees was only 1 percent. Students do not simply go to college and decide to play a varsity sport, as in high school. rt of Appeals noted in a recent Title IX case, "interest and ability rarely develop in a vacuum; they evolve as a function of opportunity and experience. In an attempt to hold the pool of schools constant, it found that from the 1985-86 academic year to the 1996-97 academic year 21,000 male athletic spots disappeared, a 12 percent drop overall. Susan Reimer of the Baltimore Sun illustrated the Title IX dilemma in a recent column by saying," It doesn't make any sense to decide how many young men can play sports based on how many young women play. Collegiate football teams consist of approximately one hundred members far more than any other men's or women's sports, and are the most profitable sport when it comes to revenues gained through ticket sales and alumni support. " This method indicates that the student body should not serve as the means to base equity. With the possible exception of basketball, every men's sport is vulnerable. First, financial assistance must be awarded based on the number of male and female athletes. Title IX is an extremely valuable piece of legislation and has opened the door for women both academically and athletically, but remains as the most controversial subject facing intercollegiate athletics. Using the student body to determine gender representation actually violates the affirmative action hiring policies at most Universities. The total amounts of athletics aid must be substantially proportionate to the ratio of male and female athletes. " Decision-making in schools that relies on gender to assess what students and employees know and are able to do is both archaic and ineffective.
Common topics in this essay:
Title IX,
Title IX's,
Accounting Office,
University Miami,
Coaches Association,
Sports Foundation,
title ix,
American Olympic,
University Ohio,
University Mexico,
Brigham University,
student body,
applicant pool,
relevant applicant,
giving women,
women's sports,
wrestling men's,
male female,
men's sports,
wrestling men's gymnastics,
academically athletically,
male female athletes,
based male female,
relevant applicant pool,
enforcement title ix,
|