Fukuyama

Ajami does not believe that civilizations will clash over race and does not acknowledge the “de-westernization” of societies. He believes that Huntington places far too much emphasis on tradition.

“We have been hearing from traditionalists, but we should not exaggerate their power, for traditions are often more insistent and loud when they rupture, when people no longer really b

. . .
History has had its’ score of quarrel but it also reminds us that we still exist and that humanity has an uncanny ability to learn and survive from previously made mistakes. I see this article as a welcomed alternative to the fairly depressing world that Huntington has prescribed for us. elieve and when age-old customs lose their ability to keep men and women at home. This country is strife with conflict. He argues that we have not entered the end of history but we are still evolving. He points out that conflict arises when ethnicities are more alike than they are dissimilar.

In “The End of Progressivism” Eisuke Sakakibara again looks over the history of conflict and does not believe that conflict comes from sheer ethnicity alone.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

**Bibliography**

. ”

His ideas on tradition clearly undercut Huntington’s ideas on the re-emergence of tribalism. He points to the example of China’s social market economy. His ideas seem to make much more sense. The article was more economically focused than I expected but the data that he provide supports his arguments well.

In “the Myth of Global Ethnic Conflict”, John R. He also denies the premise made by Fukuyama.

Common topics in this essay:
John Bowen, Huntington Ajami, Eisuke Sakakibara, Fouad Ajami, Clash Civilizations, ethnic conflict, Seminar Paper, conflict bowen,

Approximate Word count = 556
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here