freedom
People claim to want freedom but they also seem to need limitations on that freedom. This is because freedom as well as it's limitations are both needed to live peacefully. Absolute freedom cannot be achieved because when you take away limitations you take away freedoms. With out rules governing our society, people would be able to do what they want to each other with out a certain punishment. When you examine the advantages and disadvantages of both arguments it becomes clearer. I believe that one of the major reasons freedom is so desirable is because many of the limitations on freedom do not allow us the right to have control over our own bodies. Controlling our bodies is the only thing that we actually have power over. A large number of the prohibited freedoms are crimes were you make your self the victim. Such as using drugs, prostitution, suicide, vagrancy, minor in possession, dodging the draft, entering the country illegally, and age limits on the purchase of porno!graphic materials. All of these crimes are punishable under the law. What puts these apart from most crimes is that you choose to victimize yourself (except sometimes in the case of prostitution if they are being forced to prostitute against there own will
This is freedom, you have to go to war and murder a man you have never seen. Laws specifically associated with domestic violence make it so the state presses charges against a batterer, not the victim. As long as you are not directly harming anyone else in the process, the government should not waste their time and money on something that is so trivial in comparison to crimes involving a victim. Then there are the basics such as an intricate set up of lights and signs to direct the driver. Since our tax dollars are funding the projects we should be informed if they are making any progress, or just mutilating animals. When they try to use their freedom of speech to inform the public of the violation of their rights, the FCC enforce censorship and the public never sees the tape. The punishment they receive is penalization and community service. It seems to me that the issues that are most important for the public to be apart of are the! issues that we are not allowed to express our opinions on. We render background checks on adoptive parents, foster parents and anyone that works with children, so we do not put the child in the situation in the first place. If we are to expect are children to be able to discriminate truths from falsehoods they need to know the whole story. The worst part is you don't have to be diagnosed with a dementia, all that they have to say is you have authority problems and your in there as long as they want. We limit the amount of game you can hunt and fish you can catch. We have implicated new standards for gun owner to try to keep guns out of the wrong hands. Not all limitations on our freedom crush our faith in democracy though.
Common topics in this essay:
Denahey Texas,
Children's Fund,
,
limitations freedom,
absolute freedom,
child neglect,
freedom desirable limitations,
child abuse,
child abuse child,
desirable limitations freedom,
laws protecting,
animal cruelty,
domestic violence,
hate crimes,
companies information,
abuse child,
|
Acceptance Essays
