Can My University Monitor My Email?
Historically, on college campuses, there is a certain adversarial dynamic between the Associated Students (student government) and the University Administration/Cabinet. Along with this dynamic comes the realization that the University Administration/Cabinet carries power over the Associated Students, much like an employer to an employee. They can veto the AS budget if so desired or even not allow the AS to spend their budget or use University facilities. On this train of thought, I began thinking about how this situation applies to our technologically dependent CSUMB community. Does the University Administration/Cabinet of any school have the authority to check student’s email accounts? It seems to be an easy question to look up the answer to and yet, the answer lies in the interpretation of many rules and regulations. Some of these have been recently established and others currently in legislation. The Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA) I began my search in what better place to find newly passed laws, the Internet. In 1986, the Electronic Communication Privacy Act (ECPA) was passed. This is a patchwork of provisions . . .
Hopefully, the Information Technology department at CSUMB will get the hint and do the same. (1986) Can A University Monitor My Email, CAF. This alleviates the potential for lawsuits from monitoring email accounts such as in the court cases Smyth v. ” (2) In other words, if a necessary feature of systems administration involves inspecting the contents of messages, there is no ECPA violation. The link to this document, and other CSUMB policies, can be found at http://it. I believe it would be important to create one as soon as possible. The court did not find any reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of Smyth’s email communications that were voluntarily made to his supervisor over the company email system. The court disagreed, interpreting the statute to apply only to surreptitious monitoring of voice. The court went further to say, “Once plaintiff communicated the alleged unprofessional comments to a second person (his supervisor) over an email system which was apparently utilized by the entire company, any reasonable expect! ation of privacy was lost. (1994) E-mail Privacy in the Workplace – To What Extent, Marcus Steer & Freibrun Law firms. ”(3) This means that email accounts can be monitored at the discretion of the California State University system.
Common topics in this essay:
Epson America, Michael Smyth, Act ECPA, California University, Privacy Act, University Administration/Cabinet, Conclusion Ultimately, Carl Kadie, Pillsbury According, MbGraw Hill, privacy act, world wide web, retrieved december, world wide, 2000 world, email accounts, california university, email system, freedom speech, wide web, 2000 world wide, privacy act ecpa, employee epson, retrieved december 2, december 2 2000, |