Who doesn’t like to sit in front of his television watching horror movies in a comfortable couch while eating a fresh, hot pack of pop-corn? Most people would say that this means entertainment for them! Moreover, how many repeated times most of us have been looking for the new horror movie available in our video club, but it is rented? Many other examples can be brought such us the movies which are the highest in the box-office every year ‘horror films’. Therefore, the horror movies are characterized as the most lovable and popular world-wide. However, many psychologist, scientists and filmmakers have a debate on whether horror films are a success considering the acceptance from the audience or not! Stephen King the master of horror films states that : “It may be that horror movies provide psychic relief on this level because this invitation to lapse into simplicity, irrationality and even outright madness is extended so rarely” (785). His theory of the “mentally-ill” society has been followed from many others such as Dirks and Solomon. Contrary, others believe that these kinds of films can only have negative effects on the psychology and mentality of humans such as the increasing of violence. No matter how
. . .
much most of us enjoy watching horror movies; horror movies can’t affect the watchers positively; contrary , they have a violent impact on the psychology of the viewers. Consequently, the hypothesis of Tim Dirks can’t be characterized as accurate. This theory’s base is found in the beast within us which through watching movies doesn’t come up because when watching a movie each of us is transferred to the story and all his violence is released after seeing the beast prevail. H Tannebaum is the leading exponent of the ‘arousal hypothesis’ which holds that exposure to television violence increases aggression because violence increases excitation or ’arouses’ viewers”(2). On the other hand, daily violence can make us unconscious. Moreover, the majority of the films don’t have a very sympathetic beast if they want to be frightening or horrifying which is actually the purpose! Furthermore, who could see the head of a beautiful, good-nature lady being broken into pieces and not feel more or less sick? Probably, every normal person should react negatively. Actually, who could judge negatively his own creations? Probably, no one! Therefore, it is nice that some “gifted” persons from show-biz could actually even find a theory…!
. Consequently, our social stereotypes have created in us the opposing feelings for doing something that we don’t want to do, but we must do it! However, who would go swimming after seeing “Jaws” or take a shower after watching “Psycho”?(Arbor 1). It is very different to entertain yourself when you aren’t afraid and you just like the unpreparedness of this kind of movies!
Moreover, The “archetypal schizophrenic man “ which Solomon finds as an answer to the sympathy of evil characters suggest that every person who goes through difficulties sometimes becomes violent and cruel. Therefore, our tendency to overcome fear comes from the prejudices that men must be brave in order to make everybody around them proud! However, in our days the feministic movement would say that women can watch, too; and the story of being fearless goes along with the many social stereotypes which influence humanity. Horror films can’t have a positive impact in our personality; contrary, they are devastating for people’s mentality, and they can create negative psychological effects.
Firstly, let’s start from the theory of Stephen King which says that in order to show that we aren’t afraid we watch horror films.
Approximate Word count =
1475
Approximate Pages =
6 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|
