The free market economy is a beautiful thing. Just take
a moment to think about all the different forces that
have to come together on any given day just so the foods
you need for an average breakfast are present at your
local supermarket. Potatoes from Idaho, oranges from
florida, bannanas from Costa Rica, coffee from Colombia,
all these foods arrive not only in a reasonable time
frame, but at a reasonable price as well. All totaled,
each different item on your breakfast table probably
involved hundreds of different people, all simplely
trying to make a buck, to have it appear in your local
supermarket. If some sort of bureacratic organization
was charged with trying to organize the way food stuffs
are moved around the world, surely it would be no where
near as effiecent as the current free market system,
that only rests upon everyone trying to basically screw
everyone else. All this international trade is done for
the most part without regulation, and where there is
regulation, in the form of tariffs, its purpose is to
inhibit the natural outside forces to protect local or
national interests. Therefore in my opnion, I
personally subscribe to the Laissez-Faire mindset that
the government should only interfere when absolutely
necessary, and even then it should proceed with caution.
Why mess with a system that works so flawlessly and
efficiently on its own? Sure, at times subsidies are
needed, but these should be short lived, so the
industries they help start can begin to flourish on
their own, and became successful independent components
of the free market economy. In the case of monopolies, I
think they should be left alone until they prove
dangerous to the populous at large. Companies work very
hard to become the best in their field, and if they are
rewarded by market dominance, so be it, they earned it.
Rumors of Microsoft being broken apart by the DoJ
simplel...