Different historians' views o
Different historians' views on whether Henry VII was modern or medieval.The statement that Henry Tudor created a 'new monarchy' is one that was even debated at the time. Throughout the years historians views have consistently contrasted and changed. The actual 'new monarchy' theory is owed much to the historian J.R.Green and his reference to the events of 1471-1509 in his book "Short History of the English People" (published in 1876) as the emergence of a new monarchy. J.R. Green suggests this monarchy restored the power and authority to the crown after the events of the war of the roses. He also hinted at the start of tudor despotism an idea supported by several early 20th century historians. Albert Pollard was one of many historians to expand on J.R. Green's theory and move the beginning of the new monarchy to 1485. This is hardly surprising as the date coincides with the beginning of a new dynasty that lasted well over a century and is considered a period of great
In particular Pollard emphasised the Tudor's creation of the nation state. More recent historians are content to discard Henry VII as an innovator and argue as to whether or not Henry VII was simply carrying on the work of his Yorkist predecessors. In the last 50 years the concept of Henry VII creating the new monarchy is greatly opposed. Chrimes in a biography of Henry VII published in 1972 contrasted still. The majority of historians argue that no new monarchy existed or that 1485 marked only a dynastic change. "Geoffrey Elton preferred to shift the development of the new monarchy to the 1530's and the reforming of Henry VIII's minister Thomas Cromwell. Grant also felt that Henry's personal control over government that made his reign unique rather than the changes of any government methods:"However, the level and extent of Henry's personal control was much greater than that of any of his predecessors; indeed in this respect he is perhaps unique. In fact Elton believed the whole idea of a new monarchy unhelpful and that it "only confuses and ought to be abolished". Early 20th century historians historians look highly on the Tudor government as it was seen as creating the basis of the modern nation state. "A lot of historians studying this period prefer to look at the concept as more of an evolution than a revolution.
Common topics in this essay:
Henry VII,
Grant Henry's,
JR Green's,
Henry Tudor,
JR Green,
Tudor England,
France Spain,
Edward IV's,
Earlier Tudors,
Geoffrey Elton,
henry vii,
henry's personal control,
henry's personal,
personal control,
century historians,
'new monarchy',
edward iv,
20th century,
war roses,
historians argue,
20th century historians,
|
Acceptance Essays
