Is science bad or good?

Length: 1 Pages 361 Words

I strongly believe that science, and all of it components are good. Science by definition is the search of new knowledge, how can this be bad? Everything has the potential of being good or bad. It all depends on the people who are behind it. Nurses deliver anti-biotics, which can cure a number of diseases. On the other hand those abusing drugs, such as heroin users, use needles. No one is arguing saying that needles are evil, because it’s an inanimate, the same rule should apply with science. Some people say without scienc Continue...

More sample essays on Is science bad or good?

    Group & Teamwork Experiences: The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly
    .... or group members are not fulfilling their task(s), then I .... There are times when I have my bad days, but I'm .... friends and I decided to do a group science project. .... (429 2 )

    Cultural Relativism Vs Universal Childrena€™s Rights
    Cultural Relativism Vs Universal ChildrenâÂÂs Rights. .... companies - in other words, Christian Science treatments - are .... behavior as correction for bad behavior .... (3097 12 )

    Children’s Health
    ChildrenÂs Health. .... Because nutrition is an evolving science it often seems complex and confusing .... menu rather than labeling foods as "good foods" or "bad foods .... (3054 12 )

    .... Finally it happens this small idea of science fiction becomes .... along with bring back many of today?s extinct animals. .... Do the few bad things that can come out of .... (773 3 )

    Myth or Science
    .... production of both good and bad karma, or .... stating that it, and science, are possible .... Bibliography Bibliography: Hetherington, Norriss S. Cosmology : Historical .... (2399 10 )

    Cloning: A Scientific Advancem
    .... Science should be in service of the noblest goals for .... is who decides what constitutes a "bad" or "good .... Works Cited Campbell, Courtney S. "Cloning Human Beings .... (2309 9 )

Science is involved in every profession, lawyers, detectives, and firefighters depend on facts, to solve certain crimes or to prove that a pacific incident has occurred. e life would be better or simpler, but in reality science is the reason people are able to watch television, the reason people are living much longer and healthier life's. We see them use science more often in crimes of murder, arson, and rapes; forensics, is what is used solve these almost unbreakable crimes. It's not the technology that's causes the war anyway; it's our own human characteristics, like greed, vanity, and jealousy. Before these technological advances people still had wars, they just through rocks, and spears. A popular opposing argument is without science there would be no war, or bombs or mass destruction. Without science a lot of people would pull muscles, strain them or dislocate a joint. Science is needed in every day life, from cooking to playing a CD. Weight Lifters, athletes, and trainers all use science, they all know the principle of overloading muscles, and they understand isometrics, a way to exercise. If we combat these human flaws, then we will rid the world of people's fears of technology. It is not science that created all of the destruction, and horrible pain it is the people who controlling the machines who cause the harm.


"Is All Publicity Good Publicity
can be said to be the art (or science) of gaining that there is no such thing as bad publicity. York: McGraw-Hill Trade Stauber, JC; Rampton, S. (1995), Toxic (1666 7 )

Sociological Models of Deviance Theory The purpose of this
woman might, at any unexpected moment, turn out to be bad. Shover, N., & Norland, S. (1978, February). Sex roles and criminality: science or conventional wisdom (2828 11 )

IQ and EQ
Ed. Margaret S. Clark. setting 2. Original theory suffers from EQ shortcomings V. Problematic EQ popularity: Bad science drives out good Original theory (2350 9 )

Lacan's Approach to Language
of the accretion of evidence for the ontology of the "bad." Whether the ego formulation of the shape that linguistics as a science takes is S/s; he cites (2317 9 )

Scientific Paradigm in Literature
But good science and bad writing will not guarantee good fiction, which means that the authentic Scholes, Robert, and Rabkin, Eric S. Science Fiction, History (3793 15 )

Social Study of Science
by others, such as the Viking,s but they to representation are merely matters of bad scientific practice. In other words, science involves an analysis based on (1649 7 )