Is science bad or good?

Length: 1 Pages 361 Words

I strongly believe that science, and all of it components are good. Science by definition is the search of new knowledge, how can this be bad? Everything has the potential of being good or bad. It all depends on the people who are behind it. Nurses deliver anti-biotics, which can cure a number of diseases. On the other hand those abusing drugs, such as heroin users, use needles. No one is arguing saying that needles are evil, because it’s an inanimate, the same rule should apply with science. Some people say without scienc Continue...

More sample essays on Is science bad or good?

    Cloning, Good or Bad
    Cloning, Good or Bad. Can we and should we clone humans? Cloning .... individual. Changes in science and technology have never been so advancing. .... (1427 6 )

    Group & Teamwork Experiences: The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly
    .... Now that was bad. .... when I told them that my information was going to be turned in as an individual science project .... In the end, everything turned out to be good. .... (429 2 )

    English Only - Good or Bad?
    English Only - Good or Bad? .... Bilingualism is good for children of all backgrounds .... All core subjects Intermediate Art, Music, PE ESL, Math, Science Social Studies .... (651 3 )

    Advances in Science....Good or
    Advances in Science....Good or. Advances in Science.....Good or Bad? In this day in age there are many advances in science. Scientists .... (531 2 )

    Animals Rights: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly
    .... It is hard to define a good or bad side a right .... With all the new advancements in science and medicine most of these old world techniques can be thrown out. .... (3367 13 )

Science is involved in every profession, lawyers, detectives, and firefighters depend on facts, to solve certain crimes or to prove that a pacific incident has occurred. e life would be better or simpler, but in reality science is the reason people are able to watch television, the reason people are living much longer and healthier life's. We see them use science more often in crimes of murder, arson, and rapes; forensics, is what is used solve these almost unbreakable crimes. It's not the technology that's causes the war anyway; it's our own human characteristics, like greed, vanity, and jealousy. Before these technological advances people still had wars, they just through rocks, and spears. A popular opposing argument is without science there would be no war, or bombs or mass destruction. Without science a lot of people would pull muscles, strain them or dislocate a joint. Science is needed in every day life, from cooking to playing a CD. Weight Lifters, athletes, and trainers all use science, they all know the principle of overloading muscles, and they understand isometrics, a way to exercise. If we combat these human flaws, then we will rid the world of people's fears of technology. It is not science that created all of the destruction, and horrible pain it is the people who controlling the machines who cause the harm.


Stories and Handicapped Children Not all good writers write good
be counted on to select and edit entertaining and insightful science fiction sense of the tragedy of life: whether a person is good or bad, bad things happen (2485 10 )

Beliefs of Various Philosophers
The purpose of political science is to secure the good. Aquinas speaks of human behavior in terms of habits and asks whether habits are bad or good and what (2561 10 )

Contemporary Political Ideologies
are the good guys and who are the bad guys. Although much of the basic pattern has not changed and the identical pattern can be found in some science fiction (1568 6 )

"Is All Publicity Good Publicity
publicity." Publicity, therefore, can be said to be the art (or science) of gaining Determining What Publicity is Good and What Publicity is Bad Otnes and (1666 7 )

International Political Issues
In terms of methodology, for example, he faults behavioral science with being of corruption and incompetence that have turned good policy into bad. (1086 4 )

Natural Law, God, Human Nature
thing [ie, good] to another [ie, bad]." He accepts into whether the fiat preceded the good or is materialistic observations, but Lewis says science cannot name (1743 7 )