Fascism
Should Similar SYSTEMS of Free Enterprise Degenerate, Would Their Most Likely Outcomes, in the Short Term, Free enterprise and individualist democracy is a good political system. Probably the best system mankind could come up with so far. Countries, who's governments belong to free enterprise, have world's leading economic structures and are the wealthiest. Now historical analysis shows, that nations tend to switch between types of governments. Even in US, there's an infinitive struggle for power between democrats and republicans. The first step of a government's shift towards socialism is taking all means of production away from general ownership by people in its own hands, either by direct use of force or by assigning of labor unions to itself. In a situation where all means of production in the country are controlled by its government, there will already be a hint of tension inside the governing institution as to who has more power and who will control more important aspects. Mass man, as a model, or even a starting line, will, of course, affec
Other nations had their proletariat, despite its victories, stopped halfway because of mistakes in it's leadership and the power slipped to the regime of military dictatorship. But it's only in Russia, that proletariat was able to take all power in its hands and not only create but also maintain a worker's state. A military dictatorship is purely a bureaucratic institution, reinforced by the military machine and based upon the disorientation of the people and their submission to it. The world has seen those "someones" in figures of Joe Stalin, Bennitto Mussolini, Adolf Hitler and others. Fascism in Europe started to progress within several nations at almost same time - right after the World War I; countries that were involved the most occurred series of brilliantly victorious revolutions. Another point that could be brought is that no matter how good the system is, people who live under will never like 100% of it. The rebellion starts from forming a revolutionary party, such as worker's militia. This can lead to a situation when someone with an exceptional orator's abilities and lots of guts will literally get up on the tribune and publically promise better times. After some time their feelings can change and they can become rebellious against the dictatorship, but again, they would need to find or, at least, notice the orator figure among themselves. Those who tried to speak up, were threatened accordingly; most famous was Trotsky. Mass movements, with their leaders employing great deal of demagogy to work for them and create the movements themselves, overwhelmed affected nations. The successes of fascism easily make people lose all perspective, lead them to forget the actual conditions which made the strengthening and the victory of fascism possible. Something will always be wrong and if officials fix what's wrong, people will find something else because there are just too many people who have nothing better to do than check government's work over and over and over again. Yet a clear understanding of these conditions is of especial importance to the workers of he United States. Now obviously, the last line brings to mind the definition of fascism, which would be the outcome.
Common topics in this essay:
World War,
Oligarchy Free,
Hitler Fascism,
Fascism Europe,
free enterprise,
military machine,
military dictatorship,
means production,
|