My value premise will be that of justice, defined by those standards that would be adopted by people if they were behind a “veil of ignorance” as to their particular situation in society.
My first contention is that for many people to live, transplants may be due to save their lives. 10 people die everyday in the United States of America while they are waiting for an organ transplant that nev
. . .
There has been 20,045 lifesaving transplants in 1997 which 3/5 of them were transplanted by the deceased. There are over 62,000 Americans that are on an organ transplant waiting list. This number of transplants for the number of people who do need them does not even out and there must be a change in the system of opt-in or opt-out. To meet this need we must ensure that our lives and our bodies be taken care of through thorough examinations and evaluations of the quality of life that is served to us. Justice does not permit the loss of a life towards unjust reason, which is why there must be a correlation between the number of deceased possible donors and the need for transplant. This list grows rapidly, while the number of donors does not. This system allows that if there is no specification, no transplant will be preformed, which means another life lost.
My second contention is that as humans, we have all shared needs. Take personal survival for example.
While presumed consent to organ donation after death is justified by ethical principles, the principle of respect for autonomy also justifies presumed consent
.
Approximate Word count =
269
Approximate Pages =
1 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|
