This drama effectively illustrates the difference between thinking you know something and truly knowing it. Euthyphro believes himself to be the authority in the practice and interpretation of his religion. Euthyphro has a great deal of respect for Socrates and is shocked to find that he has been charged with corrupting the minds of Athen’s youth. When Socrates asks what brings Euthyphro to court, Socrates is equally shocked to find that Euthyphro is prosecuting his own father for murder. Socrates’ response to this clearly identifies this as socially unacceptable and at the same time challenges Euthyphros wisdom, “By the powers, Euthyphro! How little does the common herd know about what is right in such a case. A man must be an extraordinary man and have made great strides in wisdom before he could have been able to bring this charge” (10). Euthyphro’s reply is simply, “Indeed, Socrates, he must have made great strides” (10). Socrates is of course intrigued and amused at Euthypro’s attitude and pompousness and decides to investigate it further. At first it is hard to detect Socrates’ use of irony towards Euthyphro, but it becomes more and more apparent as the drama unfolds. Euthyphro explains to
. . .
This, for Socrates, is like pouring fuel on the fire and he begins to badger Euthyphro with more questions. Euthyphro felt that he knew what all the gods would agree on as holy or unholy. Euthyphro is thoroughly frustrated and tells Socrates that he is in a hurry and must go. Socrates voices that he is disappointed that he will not be able to use his definition of holiness and unholiness in his defense at his upcoming trial. Euthyphro explains that holiness is to be like him. It should be simple for Euthyphro to answer. Euthyphro agrees to this and is confident that it would help Socrates. Zeus punished his father Cronos because he devoured his sons. He accomplished his intention by proving to Euthyphro, a self-proclaimed expert, that he really does not know much of anything at all. Euthyphro insists that they are and that he believes every last word. Socrates tries to begin the whole process again and ask the first question since it has not adequately been answered. Socrates that it does not matter if a man is a relative or not, if he has done something unholy, he must be punished. So Socrates helped Euthyphro dig himself into a hole further by changing the definition slightly, “what all the gods hate is unholy, and what they all love is holy and what some of them love and others hate is both or neither” (14). He then left the man in the ditch to seek council from a priest on how to deal with this matter. Euthyphro begins to get frustrated with Socrates and complains, “I really do not know, Socrates, how to say what I mean.
Approximate Word count =
1019
Approximate Pages =
4 (250 words per page double spaced)
Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.
| CREDIT CARD |
ONLINE CHECK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JOIN BY PHONE
|
|
|