Subjects:
The narrator in the poem has a very clear opinion of the necessity of the wall. He first states “there where it is we do not need the wall” since the wall is unnecessary because he already has an apple orchard and his neighbor has pine trees to separate them. When the narrator discloses this to the neighbor, the neighbors only response is “good fences make good neighbors.” The narrator seeks to create mischief by asking “why do they make good neighbors?” further stating that he would understand the purpose of this wall if he and the neighbor were to have cattle to retain on their properties. The narrator would also like to a
. . .
the wall is ultimately mended in the end, whether the narrator helps of not, one can presume that the poem values the view of the neighbor. If there was no fence, one might take that as a cue to trespass and invade the lives of ones neighbors. The act of rebuilding the wall together is also a sign of good neighbors, this way one may never say that the other is responsible for the deterioration of the wall during the winter months because the two neighbors built this wall together. The wall is acting as a barrier, so as not to let the neighbors be involved in each others personal affairs. sk, before building a wall, “what I was walling in or walling out.
Though the two neighbors had very differing opinions on the necessity of the wall, one saying that is was actually not necessary at all and one saying that the wall might be beneficial in the end, this did not discourage the neighbor from continuing with the mending process.
The neighbor in this poem, although a man of very few words, has a strong opinion on the validity of the wall. His only real line of dialogue is “good fences make good neighbors.
Essay's Topics
All research is for reference purposes only.