Diplomatic Immunity
While unloading the ship which carried the embassy's materials, one box marked "household effects" dropped from a forklift. More than six hundred pounds of marijuana worth 500,000 British pounds (1982 prices) For centuries governments have used ambassadors, and diplomats to represent their nation. These special envoys have done everything from resolving years of conflict, deciding on how much humanitarian relief will be sent to a nation, or just being present at diplomatic dinners and ceremonies. These people have been the vital link between nations, and they have enjoyed complete immunity from the law of the host nation. Originally this immunity was extended as a courtesy to allow for an uneventful stay in the host country. While in a foreign country on official business, the diplomat would be granted exemption from arrest or detention by local authorities; their actions not subject to civil or criminal law. For the longest time this privilege produced little or no incidents. However, this unique position of freedom that diplomats, their family, and staff have been graced with has not been so ideal.
The first theory proposes that a diplomat and the staff must buy an insurance policy. The diplomat was considered an arm of the government represented. Just as embassies are considered territories of the countries the represent, the diplomat would remain within jurisdiction of the sending country while in the host country. The latter two solutions present many problems. Rejection of a diplomatic mission produces unwanted tension between nations and jeopardizes current progress. Further they cannot be asked to stand trial or submit to having their possessions searched. Earlier officials had been detected carrying 400 kilos of hashish into Cairo. The many ideas can be reduced to three ideas. " The privilege of diplomatic immunity is argued to be necessary component of the diplomatic mission. Both theories allow countries to have a way to remunerate those who have suffered from criminal acts but it still does not insure the bringing to justice of the alleged perpatrator. In most cases the sending country wishes to protect its reputation and ultimately the reputation of the diplomat, therefore refusing to give up immunity. The diplomat and his family enjoy "complete" immunity. The first dates back many centuries. The privilege of complete immunity allows for the use of the "diplomatic pouch".
Common topics in this essay:
United Kingdom,
House Commons,
United Nations,
Diplomatic Relations,
Vienna Convention,
York City,
Helsinki Copenhagen,
Legal Committee,
COMMITTEE MISSION,
diplomatic immunity,
CURRENT STATUS,
sending country,
diplomatic pouch,
host country,
vienna convention,
united nations,
country waive,
host nation,
complete immunity,
sending country waive,
country waive diplomat's,
parking tickets,
waive diplomat's immunity,
hundred pounds marijuana,
six hundred pounds,
|
Acceptance Essays
