"Labor standards [regulations] have become even more controversial because of economic recession in many parts of the world"(Raynor III 1). Employees have yet to learn what rights they have in the everyday workplace. Despite the fact that employees think that they know what those rights are, in reality, they really do not. With that, most employees do not truly understand the effects they have on the economy, either. Whether it is through individual or collective bargaining, employees assess situations as they arise, hoping what they believe is also their right. To the surprise of many, employee's rights only cover certain aspects of their own beliefs. Many believe that because they believe it is their right then it should be rightfully given to them.
             The International Labor Organization has four main standards: freedom to unionize, no child labor, no prison labor, and freedom of association. Labor standards have always been in "hot" debate as to how labor regulations affect the economy. Out of the four main standards, only one-freedom to unionize- will informatively be portrayed in this paper. Freedom to unionize is just another way of representing collective bargaining. This paper will compare, contrast, and determine how labor regulations will be benefited through individual and collective bargaining.
             With employers slowly recognizing how labor regulations and technology affect the economy, they are putting forth more effort to establish employee satisfaction. The opportunity of the employee to contribute to the decision-making process could actually benefit the business (Finzel 6). With felt contribution to the business, the employee will feel a part of the company and not a bystander. Therefore, employees will put forth more effort. Helping in job design and skill enhancement allows for the expansion of employee opportunities. Through fair and objective treatment, employees will show ...