House Arrest
Home incarceration formed as a new topic in criminal justice to help prevent overcrowding in prisons. Judges, lawyers, police agencies, and other government officials are looking for ways to prevent overcrowding in America's prison system. Bad policies led to a great increase in arrests, which in turn clogged up the courts and jails. With more criminals coming in mass numbers, the criminal justice department does not know where to place them. This overpopulation leads to more criminals put on probation and released with minimal sentencing. These factors decrease the effectiveness of our prison system as a deterrent. Many policies have been tried and failed; now home incarceration steps up to the task of helping our system.Two types of home incarceration, Community and Electronic Monitoring, work by placing would-be prisoners in their homes with restrictions such as where and when the can leave. The system has been proven to work efficiently and with low costs. Community monitoring works with community volunteers who watch an individual, and they conduct periodic checks with an individual. Anytime the individual breaks his limitations he is reported to probation officers by the volunteer. Electronic mon
Costs for using electronic monitoring is also lower than imprisonment. The return rates for rule violations are higher than those returned for alleged new offenses or running away. The success rates have ranged from 71% to 98%. It would be ridiculous not to consider home incarceration as an alternative to prisons. Punishment in America will never be consistent; terms of punishment are solely up to the judge's decision. Only 15% of the courts using house arrest do not believe it is working efficiently and effectively. They may let the individual get away with some of the smaller problems. To keep someone in prison for one year costs $25,000- a cost that does not compare to the low costs of home incarceration. The judge can use the criteria to make his decision. It is a definite way to help fight overcrowding in our prison systems. Studies showed home incarceration actually frightened offenders. The risks involved with this system are incredibly low and do not have an overly harmful effect if something did go wrong. Along with not paying for living situations, the state does not have to pay as many people to watch over the individual. Any other metal or transmitters could also interfere with the connection to the bracelet (Anderson, 1998, p. The number one advantage of home incarceration is the cost reduction it involves.
Common topics in this essay:
Albuquerque Mexico,
Punishment America,
Baumer Mendelsohn,
Scott Hirshi,
Arrest Home,
Electronic Monitoring,
Huff Lilly,
home incarceration,
house arrest,
electronic monitoring,
criminal justice,
community monitoring,
home detention,
prevent overcrowding,
success rates,
justice department,
prison system,
criminal justice department,
Scott Hirschi,
program home incarceration,
help prevent overcrowding,
prevent overcrowding prisons,
community monitoring individual,
|
Acceptance Essays
