Graffiti Abatement
Eradicating harmful underground networks seems to be the latest trend. The epitome of this movement is the military action in Afghanistan and the anti-terrorism attitude throughout the world. Contributing is a new war breeding deep within anti-graffiti organizations and city beautification bureaus around the world. The front line is everywhere, making an efficient method of removing graffiti priceless to cities throughout the world. However, this new battleground presents a problem: what method works the best? The cities of New York and Philadelphia have established two different means of removing graffiti. The Philadelphia Anti-Graffiti Network (PAGN) was formed in January of 1984 by Mayor W. Wilson Goode, and combines four anti-graffiti programs: Graffiti Abatement Teams, Paint Voucher Program, Mural Arts Program, and Urban Artscape. (City of Philadelphia) The mayor of New York City, Mayor Giuliani, initiated the Mayor's Anti-Graffiti Task Force in July of 1995. The merits of both programs can be compared using the differences in cost, equipment, and employees each program uses.
Graffiti battlers can range from professionals, volunteers, community service organizations, and youth. Consequently, through state of the art equipment, an equitable budget, and an outstanding work force, Mayor Giuliani's Anti-Graffiti Task Force overwhelms New York graffiti. Hydro Pressure Systems is the largest state licensed pressure-washing contractor in the United States, and has been operating for over 20 years. Philadelphia's Anti-Graffiti Network allows both volunteers and trained professionals to join their war on graffiti. (City of New York) The last feature on the vehicle is undoubtedly the most sophisticated: a portable spectrophotometer that uses a sensory system to detect color pigments and, in turn, formulate the exact color of the surface. Another basis of comparison is the difference in graffiti-removal technology. Presently, Philadelphia's graffiti removal program uses Hydro Pressure Systems when dealing with graffiti. Overall, the cost of removing graffiti provides a level comparison of the two cities. Through the Philadelphia Anti-Graffiti Network, the city of Philadelphia has grown to invest as much as three million dollars a year on graffiti removal. In addition, apprehended offenders joining the PAGN work force create countless cleanup crews available across the city. The majority of the workers, however, are employed by the Department of Sanitation and are trained to operate special equipment dealing with graffiti removal. Similarly, New York spends an average three million dollars on graffiti removal. Although Philadelphia's Anti-Graffiti Network is cost efficient, uses sophisticated equipment, and employs a productive work force, the powerful New York task force overshadowed its results. Mayor Guiliani's Anti-Graffiti Task force states this unit is built from a 1997 Ford Van model E super duty vehicle, and has the ability to clean and custom paint any surface to its original color.
Common topics in this essay:
City York,
Anti-Graffiti Network,
Abatement Eradicating,
Department Sanitation,
Pressure Systems,
Conversely York's,
Ford Van,
Force July,
Philadelphia York,
Similarly York,
graffiti removal,
task force,
anti-graffiti network,
hydro pressure,
pressure systems,
removing graffiti,
hydro pressure systems,
anti-graffiti task force,
anti-graffiti task,
comparison philadelphia's anti-graffiti,
city york,
department sanitation,
program costs,
philadelphia anti-graffiti network,
philadelphia's anti-graffiti network,
|
Acceptance Essays
