Realizing Imperfection
Everything we perceive to be reality is physical and within the barriers of the physical realm, therefore, everything is explainable or describable and governed by physical laws. In the past, humans have been able to answer questions and solve problems that once appeared to be unexplainable such as gravity or the earth revolving around the sun. These once considered "brute facts" now have explanations to accompany them and should not be taken for granted as "that is just the way it is." However, humans must accept that they cannot conjure explanations for everything. In this paper, I will utilize the strategy taken by a non-reductive mechanical physicalist to support the claim that the existing explanatory gap can never be closed. The explanatory gap is theorized to exist because phenomenal states are perspectival yet brain states are not, but we seem to not be able to explain how nonperspectival items in dull gray matter can realize perspectival items. Between the two, there appears to be an enormous gap, this is the problem of mechanism. However, if it is realized that phenomenal states are both perspectivaly subjective and physical, then it is demanded as to how these phenomenal perspective stat
Granted that this is even possible, our intrinsic phenomenal translator may be able to be duplicated as an objective device that could project what a particular person was experiencing. Based on this assumption, humans cannot comprehend perfection; therefore, the explanatory gap can never be closed. One way is to simply deny that a mechanism exists in general. In the light of final physics, understanding the nature of phenomenal consciousness and filling the explanatory gap is possible. However, brute facts seem to exist to us because without them we would not be able to make sense of certain things. By exchanging specific neural patterns, someone could experience tasting wine, without actually ever taking a sip, through someone else that had already had the experience. The concept of gravity, for example, is an epistemically basic law because the processes of gravity can be measured and explained, but there will never be any further explanation as to why gravity exists the way it does instead of something different. This would make our subjective phenomenal experiences very public, especially if such a device could be transferable from person to person. The mechanical link might serve as a processor to translate nonperspectival objective neural firing patterns into perspectival experiences. If phenomenal experiences are simply realized by objective brains states through this mechanism, then experiencing the same brain state through a duplicate mechanism would result in the same phenomenal experience. This is the weak physicalist view of brute non-reductive physicalism. However, the point where this is possible requires a sense of obtainable perfection. This is why phenomenal consciousness can never be understood based on human imperfection and limitations. In the optimistic view, if this mechanism could ever be located and eventually understood, the explanatory gap would begin to be closed and we might discover the nature of phenomenal consciousness. Final physics is the understanding of all universal laws that govern the physical realm of reality.
Common topics in this essay:
Realizing Imperfection,
explanatory gap,
final physics,
phenomenal consciousness,
non-reductive mechanical,
physical realm,
realized objective,
explanatory gap closed,
realized objective brains,
nature phenomenal consciousness,
brain mechanism,
gap closed,
final physics understanding,
physics understanding,
phenomenal translator,
|
Acceptance Essays
